[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0h4u6+4N5ZBSu6CRKn4GCBPgPHC_5-crzULozhzCTCh6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2021 17:28:34 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Yang Li <yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] PCI/ACPI: Fix acpi_pci_osc_control_set() kernel-doc comment
On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 3:29 AM Yang Li <yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
>
> Add the description of @support and remove @req in
> acpi_pci_osc_control_set() kernel-doc comment to remove warnings found
> by running scripts/kernel-doc, which is caused by using 'make W=1'.
>
> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c:337: warning: Excess function parameter 'req'
> description in 'acpi_pci_osc_control_set'
> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c:337: warning: Function parameter or member
> 'support' not described in 'acpi_pci_osc_control_set'
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Fixes: 6bc779ee05d4 ("PCI/ACPI: Check for _OSC support in acpi_pci_osc_control_set()")
> Signed-off-by: Yang Li <yang.lee@...ux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index 41a8fef06534..084916604f3c 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_get_pci_dev);
> * acpi_pci_osc_control_set - Request control of PCI root _OSC features.
> * @handle: ACPI handle of a PCI root bridge (or PCIe Root Complex).
> * @mask: Mask of _OSC bits to request control of, place to store control mask.
> - * @req: Mask of _OSC bits the control of is essential to the caller.
> + * @support: _OSC supported capability.
> *
> * Run _OSC query for @mask and if that is successful, compare the returned
> * mask of control bits with @req. If all of the @req bits are set in the
> --
Applied as 5.17 material, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists