linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Forbid KVM_SET_CPUID{,2} after KVM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220103104057.4dcf7948@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Jan 2022 10:40:57 +0100
From:   Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>
To:     Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Forbid KVM_SET_CPUID{,2} after KVM_RUN

On Mon, 03 Jan 2022 09:04:29 +0100
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com> wrote:

> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> writes:
> 
> > On 12/27/21 18:32, Igor Mammedov wrote:  
> >>> Tweaked and queued nevertheless, thanks.  
> >> it seems this patch breaks VCPU hotplug, in scenario:
> >> 
> >>    1. hotunplug existing VCPU (QEMU stores VCPU file descriptor in parked cpus list)
> >>    2. hotplug it again (unsuspecting QEMU reuses stored file descriptor when recreating VCPU)
> >> 
> >> RHBZ:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028337#c11
> >>   
> >
> > The fix here would be (in QEMU) to not call KVM_SET_CPUID2 again. 
> > However, we need to work around it in KVM, and allow KVM_SET_CPUID2 if 
> > the data passed to the ioctl is the same that was set before.  
> 
> Are we sure the data is going to be *exactly* the same? In particular,
> when using vCPU fds from the parked list, do we keep the same
> APIC/x2APIC id when hotplugging? Or can we actually hotplug with a
> different id?

If I recall it right, it can be a different ID easily.