lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 03 Jan 2022 13:56:53 +0100
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>
Cc:     Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: Forbid KVM_SET_CPUID{,2} after KVM_RUN

Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com> writes:

> On Mon, 03 Jan 2022 09:04:29 +0100
> Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com> wrote:
>
>> Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com> writes:
>> 
>> > On 12/27/21 18:32, Igor Mammedov wrote:  
>> >>> Tweaked and queued nevertheless, thanks.  
>> >> it seems this patch breaks VCPU hotplug, in scenario:
>> >> 
>> >>    1. hotunplug existing VCPU (QEMU stores VCPU file descriptor in parked cpus list)
>> >>    2. hotplug it again (unsuspecting QEMU reuses stored file descriptor when recreating VCPU)
>> >> 
>> >> RHBZ:https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2028337#c11
>> >>   
>> >
>> > The fix here would be (in QEMU) to not call KVM_SET_CPUID2 again. 
>> > However, we need to work around it in KVM, and allow KVM_SET_CPUID2 if 
>> > the data passed to the ioctl is the same that was set before.  
>> 
>> Are we sure the data is going to be *exactly* the same? In particular,
>> when using vCPU fds from the parked list, do we keep the same
>> APIC/x2APIC id when hotplugging? Or can we actually hotplug with a
>> different id?
>
> If I recall it right, it can be a different ID easily.
>

It's broken then. I'd suggest we revert the patch from KVM and think
about the strategy how to proceed. Going forward, we really want to ban
KVM_SET_CPUID{,2} after KVM_RUN (see the comment which my patch moves).
E.g. we can have an 'allowlist' of things which can change (and put
*APICids there) and only fail KVM_SET_CPUID{,2} when we see something
else changing. In QEMU, we can search the parked CPUs list for an entry
with the right *APICid and reuse it only if we manage to find one.

-- 
Vitaly

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ