[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220103141705.6hqflhwykqmtfim6@black.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2022 17:17:05 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, david@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, jgross@...e.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
joro@...tes.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com, knsathya@...nel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, sdeep@...are.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/26] x86/tdx: Make pages shared in ioremap()
On Mon, Dec 27, 2021 at 09:07:10AM -0600, Tom Lendacky wrote:
> Why can't this follow the cc_platform_has() logic and maybe even live in
> the cc_platform.c file (though there might be issues with that, I haven't
> really looked)?
There's issue with declaring cc_pgprot_encrypted()/cc_pgprot_decrypted()
in cc_platform.h. It requires pgprot_t to be defined and attempt to
include relevant header leads to circular dependencies.
Moreover, pgprot_t defined in different headers, depending on an
architecture.
I'm not sure how to unwind this dependency hell. Any clues?
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists