[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220104151123.GA2005@willie-the-truck>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 15:11:23 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
bbudiredla@...vell.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu: Fix return value check
in tad_pmu_probe()
On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 07:22:52PM +0800, Yang Yingliang wrote:
> In case of error, the function devm_ioremap() returns NULL
> pointer not ERR_PTR(). The IS_ERR() test in the return value
> check should be replaced with NULL test.
>
> Fixes: 036a7584bede ("drivers: perf: Add LLC-TAD perf counter support")
> Reported-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c
> index 250dd4c52d70..7f4d292658e3 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/marvell_cn10k_tad_pmu.c
> @@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ static int tad_pmu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> regions[i].base = devm_ioremap(&pdev->dev,
> res->start,
> tad_pmu_page_size);
> - if (IS_ERR(regions[i].base)) {
> + if (!regions[i].base) {
> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "TAD%d ioremap fail\n", i);
> return -ENOMEM;
Thanks, but Dan already caught this:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211217145907.GA16611@kili
I'll push out his fix soon.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists