lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa3bdf14-582c-2636-cdd4-cec2013d2b10@collabora.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Jan 2022 16:53:29 +0100
From:   AngeloGioacchino Del Regno 
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To:     Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>,
        Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
        linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>, youlin.pei@...iatek.com,
        anan.sun@...iatek.com, chao.hao@...iatek.com,
        yen-chang.chen@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 32/33] iommu/mediatek: Backup/restore regsiters for
 multi banks

Il 23/09/21 13:58, Yong Wu ha scritto:
> Each bank has some independent registers. thus backup/restore them for
> each a bank when suspend and resume.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@...iatek.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>   drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h | 14 +++++++++++---
>   2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> index 3925d1d4f2cf..3cb18ed28132 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.c
> @@ -1114,16 +1114,23 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk_iommu_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
>   {
>   	struct mtk_iommu_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>   	struct mtk_iommu_suspend_reg *reg = &data->reg;
> -	void __iomem *base = data->bank[0].base;
> +	void __iomem *base;
> +	int i = 0;
>   
> +	base = data->bank[i].base;
>   	reg->wr_len_ctrl = readl_relaxed(base + REG_MMU_WR_LEN_CTRL);
>   	reg->misc_ctrl = readl_relaxed(base + REG_MMU_MISC_CTRL);
>   	reg->dcm_dis = readl_relaxed(base + REG_MMU_DCM_DIS);
>   	reg->ctrl_reg = readl_relaxed(base + REG_MMU_CTRL_REG);
> -	reg->int_control0 = readl_relaxed(base + REG_MMU_INT_CONTROL0);
> -	reg->int_main_control = readl_relaxed(base + REG_MMU_INT_MAIN_CONTROL);
> -	reg->ivrp_paddr = readl_relaxed(base + REG_MMU_IVRP_PADDR);
>   	reg->vld_pa_rng = readl_relaxed(base + REG_MMU_VLD_PA_RNG);
> +	do {
> +		if (!data->plat_data->bank_enable[i])
> +			continue;
> +		base = data->bank[i].base;
> +		reg->int_control[i] = readl_relaxed(base + REG_MMU_INT_CONTROL0);
> +		reg->int_main_control[i] = readl_relaxed(base + REG_MMU_INT_MAIN_CONTROL);
> +		reg->ivrp_paddr[i] = readl_relaxed(base + REG_MMU_IVRP_PADDR);
> +	} while (++i < data->plat_data->bank_nr);
>   	clk_disable_unprepare(data->bclk);
>   	return 0;
>   }
> @@ -1132,9 +1139,9 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk_iommu_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>   {
>   	struct mtk_iommu_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>   	struct mtk_iommu_suspend_reg *reg = &data->reg;
> -	struct mtk_iommu_domain *m4u_dom = data->bank[0].m4u_dom;
> -	void __iomem *base = data->bank[0].base;
> -	int ret;
> +	struct mtk_iommu_domain *m4u_dom;
> +	void __iomem *base;
> +	int ret, i = 0;
>   
>   	ret = clk_prepare_enable(data->bclk);
>   	if (ret) {
> @@ -1157,18 +1164,26 @@ static int __maybe_unused mtk_iommu_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
>   	 * Uppon first resume, only enable the clk and return, since the values of the
>   	 * registers are not yet set.
>   	 */
> -	if (!m4u_dom)
> +	if (!reg->wr_len_ctrl)
>   		return 0;
>   
> +	base = data->bank[i].base;
>   	writel_relaxed(reg->wr_len_ctrl, base + REG_MMU_WR_LEN_CTRL);
>   	writel_relaxed(reg->misc_ctrl, base + REG_MMU_MISC_CTRL);
>   	writel_relaxed(reg->dcm_dis, base + REG_MMU_DCM_DIS);
>   	writel_relaxed(reg->ctrl_reg, base + REG_MMU_CTRL_REG);
> -	writel_relaxed(reg->int_control0, base + REG_MMU_INT_CONTROL0);
> -	writel_relaxed(reg->int_main_control, base + REG_MMU_INT_MAIN_CONTROL);
> -	writel_relaxed(reg->ivrp_paddr, base + REG_MMU_IVRP_PADDR);
>   	writel_relaxed(reg->vld_pa_rng, base + REG_MMU_VLD_PA_RNG);
> -	writel(m4u_dom->cfg.arm_v7s_cfg.ttbr & MMU_PT_ADDR_MASK, base + REG_MMU_PT_BASE_ADDR);
> +	do {
> +		m4u_dom = data->bank[i].m4u_dom;
> +		if (!data->plat_data->bank_enable[i] || !m4u_dom)
> +			continue;
> +		base = data->bank[i].base;
> +		writel_relaxed(reg->int_control[i], base + REG_MMU_INT_CONTROL0);
> +		writel_relaxed(reg->int_main_control[i], base + REG_MMU_INT_MAIN_CONTROL);
> +		writel_relaxed(reg->ivrp_paddr[i], base + REG_MMU_IVRP_PADDR);
> +		writel(m4u_dom->cfg.arm_v7s_cfg.ttbr & MMU_PT_ADDR_MASK,
> +		       base + REG_MMU_PT_BASE_ADDR);
> +	} while (++i < data->plat_data->bank_nr);
>   	return 0;
>   }
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> index cf4b3d10cf2c..e781ad583131 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/mtk_iommu.h
> @@ -33,11 +33,19 @@ struct mtk_iommu_suspend_reg {
>   	};
>   	u32				dcm_dis;
>   	u32				ctrl_reg;
> -	u32				int_control0;
> -	u32				int_main_control;
> -	u32				ivrp_paddr;
>   	u32				vld_pa_rng;
>   	u32				wr_len_ctrl;
> +	union {
> +		struct { /* only for gen1 */
> +			u32		int_control0;
> +		};
> +
> +		struct { /* only for gen2 that support multi-banks */
> +			u32		int_control[MTK_IOMMU_BANK_MAX];
> +			u32		int_main_control[MTK_IOMMU_BANK_MAX];
> +			u32		ivrp_paddr[MTK_IOMMU_BANK_MAX];
> +		};
> +	};

There's no need for yet another union... just update mtk_iommu_v1.c to use
int_control[0] instead of int_control0.

>   };
>   
>   enum mtk_iommu_plat {
> 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ