[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <ab1358b84c60e6c942c270e3fe1a32bfa3177f3c.1641264282.git.houwenlong93@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2022 10:45:15 +0800
From: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong93@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] KVM: eventfd: Fix false positive RCU usage warning
Fix the following false positive warning:
[ 20.995979] =============================
[ 20.996878] WARNING: suspicious RCU usage
[ 20.997792] 5.16.0-rc4+ #57 Not tainted
[ 20.998651] -----------------------------
[ 20.999544] arch/x86/kvm/../../../virt/kvm/eventfd.c:484 RCU-list traversed in non-reader section!!
[ 21.001490]
[ 21.001490] other info that might help us debug this:
[ 21.001490]
[ 21.003240]
[ 21.003240] rcu_scheduler_active = 2, debug_locks = 1
[ 21.004662] 3 locks held by fc_vcpu 0/330:
[ 21.005573] #0: ffff8884835fc0b0 (&vcpu->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x88/0x6f0 [kvm]
[ 21.007617] #1: ffffc90004c0bb68 (&kvm->srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: vcpu_enter_guest+0x600/0x1860 [kvm]
[ 21.009627] #2: ffffc90004c0c1d0 (&kvm->irq_srcu){....}-{0:0}, at: kvm_notify_acked_irq+0x36/0x180 [kvm]
[ 21.011732]
[ 21.011732] stack backtrace:
[ 21.012733] CPU: 26 PID: 330 Comm: fc_vcpu 0 Not tainted 5.16.0-rc4+
[ 21.014189] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[ 21.016565] Call Trace:
[ 21.017105] <TASK>
[ 21.017591] dump_stack_lvl+0x44/0x57
[ 21.018467] kvm_notify_acked_gsi+0x6b/0x70 [kvm]
[ 21.019533] kvm_notify_acked_irq+0x8d/0x180 [kvm]
[ 21.020616] kvm_ioapic_update_eoi+0x92/0x240 [kvm]
[ 21.021736] kvm_apic_set_eoi_accelerated+0x2a/0xe0 [kvm]
[ 21.022968] handle_apic_eoi_induced+0x3d/0x60 [kvm_intel]
[ 21.024168] vmx_handle_exit+0x19c/0x6a0 [kvm_intel]
[ 21.025255] vcpu_enter_guest+0x66e/0x1860 [kvm]
[ 21.026303] ? lock_acquire+0x27f/0x300
[ 21.027166] ? lock_is_held_type+0xdf/0x130
[ 21.028090] ? kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x438/0x7f0 [kvm]
[ 21.029286] ? kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x11a/0x7f0 [kvm]
[ 21.030485] kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x438/0x7f0 [kvm]
[ 21.031647] kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x38a/0x6f0 [kvm]
[ 21.032647] ? __fget_files+0x156/0x220
[ 21.033522] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x89/0xc0
[ 21.034360] ? syscall_trace_enter.isra.18+0xea/0x260
[ 21.035478] do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x90
[ 21.036259] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
Since srcu read lock is held, it's a false positive warning.
Use hlist_for_each_entry_srcu() instead of hlist_for_each_entry_rcu()
as it also checkes if the right lock is held.
Signed-off-by: Hou Wenlong <houwenlong93@...ux.alibaba.com>
---
virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
index 2ad013b8bde9..59b1dd4a549e 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/eventfd.c
@@ -463,8 +463,8 @@ bool kvm_irq_has_notifier(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned irqchip, unsigned pin)
idx = srcu_read_lock(&kvm->irq_srcu);
gsi = kvm_irq_map_chip_pin(kvm, irqchip, pin);
if (gsi != -1)
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(kian, &kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list,
- link)
+ hlist_for_each_entry_srcu(kian, &kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list,
+ link, srcu_read_lock_held(&kvm->irq_srcu))
if (kian->gsi == gsi) {
srcu_read_unlock(&kvm->irq_srcu, idx);
return true;
@@ -480,8 +480,8 @@ void kvm_notify_acked_gsi(struct kvm *kvm, int gsi)
{
struct kvm_irq_ack_notifier *kian;
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(kian, &kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list,
- link)
+ hlist_for_each_entry_srcu(kian, &kvm->irq_ack_notifier_list,
+ link, srcu_read_lock_held(&kvm->irq_srcu))
if (kian->gsi == gsi)
kian->irq_acked(kian);
}
--
2.31.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists