[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YdVGmkzgUmvPDmlE@matsya>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 12:49:54 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dmaengine tree with the
dmaengine-fixes tree
On 05-01-22, 10:04, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 14:41:00 -0700 Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com> wrote:
> >
> > >> + */
> > >> + list_for_each_entry_safe(d, t, &flist, list) {
> > >> + list_del_init(&d->list);
> > >> - complete_desc(d, IDXD_COMPLETE_NORMAL);
> > >> ++ idxd_dma_complete_txd(d, IDXD_COMPLETE_NORMAL, false);
> > > Is "false" correct here?
> >
> > Hi Geert, took a closer look today. I believe it should be 'true'
> > here since this is a normal completion that needs to release the
> > descriptors. Sorry about the previous incorrect response.
>
> I have updated my resolution from today. Thanks for the feedback.
I have merged fixes into next as well, so this should not be required
tomorrow.
Dave pls test..
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists