[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4cda2676-eee2-bc41-5030-14d05c6e8224@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 16:18:06 -0700
From: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the dmaengine tree with the
dmaengine-fixes tree
On 1/5/2022 12:19 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 05-01-22, 10:04, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> On Tue, 4 Jan 2022 14:41:00 -0700 Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com> wrote:
>>>>> + */
>>>>> + list_for_each_entry_safe(d, t, &flist, list) {
>>>>> + list_del_init(&d->list);
>>>>> - complete_desc(d, IDXD_COMPLETE_NORMAL);
>>>>> ++ idxd_dma_complete_txd(d, IDXD_COMPLETE_NORMAL, false);
>>>> Is "false" correct here?
>>> Hi Geert, took a closer look today. I believe it should be 'true'
>>> here since this is a normal completion that needs to release the
>>> descriptors. Sorry about the previous incorrect response.
>> I have updated my resolution from today. Thanks for the feedback.
> I have merged fixes into next as well, so this should not be required
> tomorrow.
>
> Dave pls test..
Tested. Looks good. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists