lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 5 Jan 2022 13:54:30 +0000
From:   Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
To:     Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        coresight@...ts.linaro.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] coresight: trbe: Work around the invalid prohibited
 states

On 05/01/2022 11:16, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/5/22 3:43 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>> Hi Anshuman
>>
>> On 05/01/2022 05:05, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>> TRBE implementations affected by Arm erratum #2038923 might get TRBE into
>>> an inconsistent view on whether trace is prohibited within the CPU. As a
>>> result, the trace buffer or trace buffer state might be corrupted. This
>>> happens after TRBE buffer has been enabled by setting TRBLIMITR_EL1.E,
>>> followed by just a single context synchronization event before execution
>>> changes from a context, in which trace is prohibited to one where it isn't,
>>> or vice versa. In these mentioned conditions, the view of whether trace is
>>> prohibited is inconsistent between parts of the CPU, and the trace buffer
>>> or the trace buffer state might be corrupted.
>>>
>>> Work around this problem in the TRBE driver by preventing an inconsistent
>>> view of whether the trace is prohibited or not based on TRBLIMITR_EL1.E by
>>> immediately following a change to TRBLIMITR_EL1.E with at least one ISB
>>> instruction before an ERET, or two ISB instructions if no ERET is to take
>>> place. This adds a new cpu errata in arm64 errata framework and also
>>> updates TRBE driver as required.
>>>
>>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
>>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
>>> Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
>>> Cc: Suzuki Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
>>> Cc: coresight@...ts.linaro.org
>>> Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
>>> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
>>> ---
>>>    Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst       |  2 +
>>>    arch/arm64/Kconfig                           | 23 ++++++++++
>>>    arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c               |  9 ++++
>>>    arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps                     |  1 +
>>>    drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c | 47 +++++++++++++++-----
>>>    5 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>
>> As with the previous patch, it may be a good idea to split the
>> patch to arm64 and trbe parts.
> 
> Sure, will do.
> 
>>
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
>>> index c9b30e6c2b6c..e0ef3e9a4b8b 100644
>>> --- a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
>>> +++ b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.rst
>>> @@ -54,6 +54,8 @@ stable kernels.
>>>    +----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
>>>    | ARM            | Cortex-A510     | #2064142        | ARM64_ERRATUM_2064142       |
>>>    +----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
>>> +| ARM            | Cortex-A510     | #2038923        | ARM64_ERRATUM_2038923       |
>>> ++----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
>>>    | ARM            | Cortex-A53      | #826319         | ARM64_ERRATUM_826319        |
>>>    +----------------+-----------------+-----------------+-----------------------------+
>>>    | ARM            | Cortex-A53      | #827319         | ARM64_ERRATUM_827319        |
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>> index 2105b68d88db..026e34fb6fad 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
>>> @@ -796,6 +796,29 @@ config ARM64_ERRATUM_2064142
>>>            If unsure, say Y.
>>>    +config ARM64_ERRATUM_2038923
>>> +    bool "Cortex-A510: 2038923: workaround TRBE corruption with enable"
>>> +    depends on CORESIGHT_TRBE
>>> +    default y
>>> +    help
>>> +      This option adds the workaround for ARM Cortex-A510 erratum 2038923.
>>> +
>>> +      Affected Cortex-A510 core might cause an inconsistent view on whether trace is
>>> +      prohibited within the CPU. As a result, the trace buffer or trace buffer state
>>> +      might be corrupted. This happens after TRBE buffer has been enabled by setting
>>> +      TRBLIMITR_EL1.E, followed by just a single context synchronization event before
>>> +      execution changes from a context, in which trace is prohibited to one where it
>>> +      isn't, or vice versa. In these mentioned conditions, the view of whether trace
>>> +      is prohibited is inconsistent between parts of the CPU, and the trace buffer or
>>> +      the trace buffer state might be corrupted.
>>> +
>>> +      Work around this in the driver by preventing an inconsistent view of whether the
>>> +      trace is prohibited or not based on TRBLIMITR_EL1.E by immediately following a
>>> +      change to TRBLIMITR_EL1.E with at least one ISB instruction before an ERET, or
>>> +      two ISB instructions if no ERET is to take place.
>>> +
>>> +      If unsure, say Y.
>>> +
>>>    config CAVIUM_ERRATUM_22375
>>>        bool "Cavium erratum 22375, 24313"
>>>        default y
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
>>> index cbb7d5a9aee7..60b0c1f1d912 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpu_errata.c
>>> @@ -607,6 +607,15 @@ const struct arm64_cpu_capabilities arm64_errata[] = {
>>>            ERRATA_MIDR_REV_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A510, 0, 0, 2)
>>>        },
>>>    #endif
>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_ERRATUM_2038923
>>> +    {
>>> +        .desc = "ARM erratum 2038923",
>>> +        .capability = ARM64_WORKAROUND_2038923,
>>> +
>>> +        /* Cortex-A510 r0p0 - r0p2 */
>>> +        ERRATA_MIDR_REV_RANGE(MIDR_CORTEX_A510, 0, 0, 2)
>>> +    },
>>> +#endif
>>>        {
>>>        }
>>>    };
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
>>> index fca3cb329e1d..45a06d36d080 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
>>> +++ b/arch/arm64/tools/cpucaps
>>> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ WORKAROUND_1463225
>>>    WORKAROUND_1508412
>>>    WORKAROUND_1542419
>>>    WORKAROUND_2064142
>>> +WORKAROUND_2038923
>>>    WORKAROUND_TRBE_OVERWRITE_FILL_MODE
>>>    WORKAROUND_TSB_FLUSH_FAILURE
>>>    WORKAROUND_TRBE_WRITE_OUT_OF_RANGE
>>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c
>>> index ec24b62b2cec..0689c6dab96d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-trbe.c
>>> @@ -92,11 +92,13 @@ struct trbe_buf {
>>>    #define TRBE_WORKAROUND_OVERWRITE_FILL_MODE    0
>>>    #define TRBE_WORKAROUND_WRITE_OUT_OF_RANGE    1
>>>    #define TRBE_WORKAROUND_SYSREG_WRITE_FAILURE    2
>>> +#define TRBE_WORKAROUND_CORRUPTION_WITH_ENABLE    3
>>>      static int trbe_errata_cpucaps[] = {
>>>        [TRBE_WORKAROUND_OVERWRITE_FILL_MODE] = ARM64_WORKAROUND_TRBE_OVERWRITE_FILL_MODE,
>>>        [TRBE_WORKAROUND_WRITE_OUT_OF_RANGE] = ARM64_WORKAROUND_TRBE_WRITE_OUT_OF_RANGE,
>>>        [TRBE_WORKAROUND_SYSREG_WRITE_FAILURE] = ARM64_WORKAROUND_2064142,
>>> +    [TRBE_WORKAROUND_CORRUPTION_WITH_ENABLE] = ARM64_WORKAROUND_2038923,
>>>        -1,        /* Sentinel, must be the last entry */
>>>    };
>>>    @@ -174,6 +176,11 @@ static inline bool trbe_may_fail_sysreg_write(struct trbe_cpudata *cpudata)
>>>        return trbe_has_erratum(cpudata, TRBE_WORKAROUND_SYSREG_WRITE_FAILURE);
>>>    }
>>>    +static inline bool trbe_may_corrupt_with_enable(struct trbe_cpudata *cpudata)
>>> +{
>>
>> minor nit: trbe_needs_{ctxt_sync, isb}_after_enable() ?
> 
> trbe_needs_ctxt_sync_after_enable() sounds better. Also will have to change
> the index above as well .. TRBE_NEEDS_CTXT_SYNC_AFTER_ENABLE.
> 
>>
>>> +    return trbe_has_erratum(cpudata, TRBE_WORKAROUND_CORRUPTION_WITH_ENABLE);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>>    static int trbe_alloc_node(struct perf_event *event)
>>>    {
>>>        if (event->cpu == -1)
>>> @@ -187,6 +194,30 @@ static inline void trbe_drain_buffer(void)
>>>        dsb(nsh);
>>>    }
>>>    +static inline void set_trbe_enabled(struct trbe_cpudata *cpudata)
>>> +{
>>> +    u64 trblimitr = read_sysreg_s(SYS_TRBLIMITR_EL1);
>>
>> minor nit: This implies we do the TRBE programming in the following
>> manner in the common case (i.e, TRBE enabled in the beginning of a
>> session).
>>    -> set TRBE LIMIT
>>    -> read TRBE LIMIT
>>    -> set TRBE ENABLED
>>
>> Could we please optimize this ? I believe the buf->trbe_limit
>> must hold the LIMITR value at any point in time. And thus this
> 
> But is not bit risky though ! We have got the following places where
> given trbe_limit instance changes its value.
> 
> drivers/../coresight-trbe.c:   buf->trbe_limit = buf->trbe_base + nr_pages * PAGE_SIZE;
> drivers/../coresight-trbe.c:   buf->trbe_limit = compute_trbe_buffer_limit(handle);
> drivers/../coresight-trbe.c:   buf->trbe_limit -= PAGE_SIZE;

Those are the places where we compute the trbe_limit, *before*
we enable the TRBE. And we don't change recompute the limit
*without disabling* the TRBE. To make it more clear, the
only place where we set TRBE enabled without "computing"
the trbe_limit is when we hit a spurious interrupt.
But the value in the TRBLIMITR should already match the
buf->trbe_limit and we are only going to re-enable the
TRBE with the same limit. The other option is to
pass down the "limit" to the set_trbe_enabled().

> 
>> function could simply be :
>>
>> set_trbe_enabled(trbe_buf)
>> {
>>      limitr = trbe_buf->limit | LIMITR_ENABLE
>>      write(limitr, TRBLIMITR_EL1);
>>      ...
>> }
> 
> Is the potential for performance improvement here, out weigh possible
> risks of using buf->trbe_limit directly while enabling the TRBE ?

I somehow don't like the fact that we have additional write and read
for the most common case of the TRBE usage (i.e, for arm_trbe_enable()).
If we could avoid that, that may be better.

Cheers
Suzuki

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ