[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YdXZeuCKo58t3kD5@google.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2022 17:46:34 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
"maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@...nel.org>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: SVM: allow to force AVIC to be enabled
On Wed, Jan 05, 2022, Maxim Levitsky wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-01-04 at 22:25 +0000, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > This is all more than a bit terrifying, though I can see the usefuless for a
> > developer. At the very least, this should taint the kernel. This should also
> > probably be buried behind a Kconfig that is itself buried behind EXPERT.
> >
> I used 'module_param_unsafe' which does taint the kernel.
Ah, neat, TIL. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists