[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220105174554.GA29945@1e936cf764ba>
Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2022 01:45:56 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH] ACPI: PCC: pcc_ctx can be static
drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c:34:22: warning: symbol 'pcc_ctx' was not declared. Should it be static?
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
---
acpi_pcc.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c
index 64552fdb73470..9df4d740b52a6 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/acpi_pcc.c
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ struct pcc_data {
struct acpi_pcc_info ctx;
};
-struct acpi_pcc_info pcc_ctx;
+static struct acpi_pcc_info pcc_ctx;
static void pcc_rx_callback(struct mbox_client *cl, void *m)
{
Powered by blists - more mailing lists