lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 6 Jan 2022 18:08:15 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Cc:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de,
        dave.hansen@...el.com, luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
        sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
        ak@...ux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com, david@...hat.com,
        hpa@...or.com, jgross@...e.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
        joro@...tes.org, knsathya@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        sdeep@...are.com, seanjc@...gle.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
        vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com, x86@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/26] x86/tdx: Handle in-kernel MMIO

On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 03:31:16PM -0800, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > +static int tdx_handle_mmio(struct pt_regs *regs, struct ve_info *ve)
> 
> Similarly, tdx_handle_mmio() returns (int) 0 for success, while other
> tdx_handle_*() functions return (bool) true for success.  Also
> confusing.

Looked at this again, you read it wrong. tdx_handle_mmio() return size of
instruction it handled so we can advance RIP and <= 0 on error. It is
consistent with other #VE handlers that positive (true) on success.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ