linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/8] signal: Make SIGKILL during coredumps an explicit special case

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 08 Jan 2022 12:13:59 -0600
From:   "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
        Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] signal: Make SIGKILL during coredumps an explicit
 special case

Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com> writes:

> 05.01.2022 22:58, Eric W. Biederman пишет:
>> 
>> I have not yet been able to figure out how to run gst-pluggin-scanner in
>> a way that triggers this yet.  In truth I can't figure out how to
>> run gst-pluggin-scanner in a useful way.
>> 
>> I am going to set up some unit tests and see if I can reproduce your
>> hang another way, but if you could give me some more information on what
>> you are doing to trigger this I would appreciate it.
>
> Thanks, Eric. The distro is Arch Linux, but it's a development
> environment where I'm running latest GStreamer from git master. I'll try
> to figure out the reproduction steps and get back to you.

Thank you.

Until I can figure out why this is causing problems I have dropped the
following two patches from my queue:
 signal: Make SIGKILL during coredumps an explicit special case
 signal: Drop signals received after a fatal signal has been processed

I have replaced them with the following two patches that just do what
is needed for the rest of the code in the series:
 signal: Have prepare_signal detect coredumps using
 signal: Make coredump handling explicit in complete_signal

Perversely my failure to change the SIGKILL handling when coredumps are
happening proves to me that I need to change the SIGKILL handling when
coredumps are happening to make the code more maintainable.

Eric