[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <875yqu14co.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>
Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2022 12:15:19 -0600
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
Kyle Huey <me@...ehuey.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] signal: Have prepare_signal detect coredumps using
signal->core_state
In preparation for removing the flag SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP, change
prepare_signal to test signal->core_state instead of the flag
SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP.
Both fields are protected by siglock and both live in signal_struct so
there are no real tradeoffs here, just a change to which field is
being tested.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211213225350.27481-1-ebiederm@xmission.com
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
kernel/signal.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index 8272cac5f429..f95a4423519d 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -906,8 +906,8 @@ static bool prepare_signal(int sig, struct task_struct *p, bool force)
struct task_struct *t;
sigset_t flush;
- if (signal->flags & (SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT | SIGNAL_GROUP_COREDUMP)) {
- if (!(signal->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT))
+ if ((signal->flags & SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT) || signal->core_state) {
+ if (signal->core_state)
return sig == SIGKILL;
/*
* The process is in the middle of dying, nothing to do.
--
2.29.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists