lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220109190552.GA2928@mail.google.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jan 2022 08:05:52 +1300
From:   Paulo Miguel Almeida <paulo.miguel.almeida.rodenas@...il.com>
To:     Sidong Yang <realwakka@...il.com>
Cc:     gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: pi433: enforce tx_cfg to be set before any
 message can be sent

On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 03:49:50PM +0000, Sidong Yang wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 11:26:52AM +1300, Paulo Miguel Almeida wrote:
> 
> Hi, Paulo.
> Thanks for the patch.
> I have some opinion below.

thanks for taking the time to review my patch :)

> > this driver relies on exposing a char device to userspace to tx
> > messages. Every message can be sent using different trasmitter settings
> > such so the tx_cfg must be written before sending any messages.
> > Failing to do so will cause the message to fail silently depending on
> > printk/dynamic_debug settings which makes it hard to troubleshoot.
> > 
> > This patch add a control variable that will get initialized once tx_cfg
> > is set for the fd used when interacting with the char device.
> 
> I don't know that adding flag is good idea. It seems that initializing
> to default is better than this.

the reasons why I thought that the flag was a good approach is because of
these points:

1 - it returns an error to userspace to help the developers 
troubleshooting what is missing/required to make a message to be
successfully tx'ed. Unfortunately, once the message is in the chip
queue, there isn't much that the user can know so, from my humble point
of view, any way we can avoid hard-to-debug problems, we should.

2 - rf69 work with multiple frequencies (315,433,868 and 915MHz) in which
acceptance varies from region to region. Essentially, picking 1 default
frequency may be ideal for one place but not right for another.

Let me know if you agree with my train of thought above and if not,
share with me your point of view.

thanks,

Paulo A.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ