Message-ID: <1j8rvnps11.fsf@starbuckisacylon.baylibre.com>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:29:45 +0100
From:   Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To:     Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com>, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 3/5] tty: serial: meson: The UART baud rate


On Mon 10 Jan 2022 at 16:56, Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com> wrote:

Title is bad (like several other patches in this series) - Please fix it

> Using the common Clock code to describe the UART baud rate clock
> makes it easier for the UART driver to be compatible with the
> baud rate requirements of the UART IP on different meson chips.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c | 224 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 163 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
> index 7570958d010c..1004fd0b0c9e 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>   */
>  
>  #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>  #include <linux/console.h>
>  #include <linux/delay.h>
>  #include <linux/init.h>
> @@ -65,9 +66,7 @@
>  #define AML_UART_RECV_IRQ(c)		((c) & 0xff)
>  
>  /* AML_UART_REG5 bits */
> -#define AML_UART_BAUD_MASK		0x7fffff
>  #define AML_UART_BAUD_USE		BIT(23)
> -#define AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL		BIT(24)
>  
>  #define AML_UART_PORT_NUM		12
>  #define AML_UART_PORT_OFFSET		6
> @@ -76,6 +75,13 @@
>  #define AML_UART_POLL_USEC		5
>  #define AML_UART_TIMEOUT_USEC		10000
>  
> +struct meson_uart_data {
> +	struct uart_port	port;
> +	struct clk		*pclk;
> +	struct clk		*baud_clk;
> +	bool			use_xtal_clk;
> +};
> +
>  static struct uart_driver meson_uart_driver;
>  
>  static struct uart_port *meson_ports[AML_UART_PORT_NUM];
> @@ -268,14 +274,11 @@ static void meson_uart_reset(struct uart_port *port)
>  static int meson_uart_startup(struct uart_port *port)
>  {
>  	u32 val;
> -	int ret = 0;
> +	int ret;
>  
> -	val = readl(port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL);
> -	val |= AML_UART_CLEAR_ERR;
> -	writel(val, port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL);
> -	val &= ~AML_UART_CLEAR_ERR;
> -	writel(val, port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL);
> +	meson_uart_reset(port);
>  
> +	val = readl(port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL);
>  	val |= (AML_UART_RX_EN | AML_UART_TX_EN);
>  	writel(val, port->membase + AML_UART_CONTROL);
>  
> @@ -293,19 +296,17 @@ static int meson_uart_startup(struct uart_port *port)
>  
>  static void meson_uart_change_speed(struct uart_port *port, unsigned long baud)
>  {
> +	struct meson_uart_data *private_data = port->private_data;
>  	u32 val;
>  
>  	while (!meson_uart_tx_empty(port))
>  		cpu_relax();
>  
> -	if (port->uartclk == 24000000) {
> -		val = ((port->uartclk / 3) / baud) - 1;
> -		val |= AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL;
> -	} else {
> -		val = ((port->uartclk * 10 / (baud * 4) + 5) / 10) - 1;
> -	}
> +	val = readl(port->membase + AML_UART_REG5);
>  	val |= AML_UART_BAUD_USE;
>  	writel(val, port->membase + AML_UART_REG5);
> +
> +	clk_set_rate(private_data->baud_clk, baud);
>  }
>  
>  static void meson_uart_set_termios(struct uart_port *port,
> @@ -395,11 +396,27 @@ static int meson_uart_verify_port(struct uart_port *port,
>  
>  static void meson_uart_release_port(struct uart_port *port)
>  {
> -	/* nothing to do */
> +	struct meson_uart_data *private_data = port->private_data;
> +
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(private_data->baud_clk);
> +	clk_disable_unprepare(private_data->pclk);
>  }
>  
>  static int meson_uart_request_port(struct uart_port *port)
>  {
> +	struct meson_uart_data *private_data = port->private_data;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(private_data->pclk);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;

In the previous version of the series, you already been asked to the
enable of pclk in the probe. Optimization should not be mixed with this
series

Please make sure all comments are addressed before re-posting

> +
> +	ret = clk_prepare_enable(private_data->baud_clk);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		clk_disable_unprepare(private_data->pclk);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -629,55 +646,105 @@ static struct uart_driver meson_uart_driver = {
>  	.cons		= MESON_SERIAL_CONSOLE,
>  };
>  
> -static inline struct clk *meson_uart_probe_clock(struct device *dev,
> -						 const char *id)
> +#define CLK_NAME(name) \
> +({\
> +	char clk_name[32];\
> +	snprintf(clk_name, sizeof(clk_name), "%s#%s", dev_name(port->dev), #name);\
> +	clk_name;\
> +})

1) This result in some ugly code being inlined
2) You return a pointer a local variable which is not gurantee to exist
anymore  outside of this ...

Please do this simply in the related function.

> +
> +static struct clk_div_table xtal_div_table[] = {
> +	{ 0, 3  },
> +	{ 1, 1  },
> +	{ 2, 2  },
> +	{ 3, 2  },
> +};
> +
> +static int meson_uart_probe_clocks(struct uart_port *port)
>  {
> -	struct clk *clk = NULL;
> -	int ret;
> +	struct meson_uart_data *private_data = port->private_data;
> +	struct clk *clk_baud, *clk_xtal;
> +	struct clk_hw *hw;
> +	struct clk_parent_data use_xtal_mux_parents[2] = {
> +		{ .index = -1, },
> +		{ .index = -1, },
> +	};
>  
> -	clk = devm_clk_get(dev, id);
> -	if (IS_ERR(clk))
> -		return clk;
> +	private_data->pclk = devm_clk_get(port->dev, "pclk");
> +	if (IS_ERR(private_data->pclk))
> +		return dev_err_probe(port->dev, PTR_ERR(private_data->pclk),
> +				     "Failed to get the 'pclk' clock\n");
>  
> -	ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "couldn't enable clk\n");
> -		return ERR_PTR(ret);
> +	clk_baud = devm_clk_get(port->dev, "baud");
> +	if (IS_ERR(clk_baud)) {
> +		dev_err(port->dev, "Failed to get the 'baud' clock\n");
> +		return PTR_ERR(clk_baud);
>  	}
>  
> -	devm_add_action_or_reset(dev,
> -			(void(*)(void *))clk_disable_unprepare,
> -			clk);
> -
> -	return clk;
> -}
> -
> -static int meson_uart_probe_clocks(struct platform_device *pdev,
> -				   struct uart_port *port)
> -{
> -	struct clk *clk_xtal = NULL;
> -	struct clk *clk_pclk = NULL;
> -	struct clk *clk_baud = NULL;
> -
> -	clk_pclk = meson_uart_probe_clock(&pdev->dev, "pclk");
> -	if (IS_ERR(clk_pclk))
> -		return PTR_ERR(clk_pclk);
> -
> -	clk_xtal = meson_uart_probe_clock(&pdev->dev, "xtal");
> +	clk_xtal = devm_clk_get(port->dev, "xtal");
>  	if (IS_ERR(clk_xtal))
> -		return PTR_ERR(clk_xtal);
> -
> -	clk_baud = meson_uart_probe_clock(&pdev->dev, "baud");
> -	if (IS_ERR(clk_baud))
> -		return PTR_ERR(clk_baud);
> +		return dev_err_probe(port->dev, PTR_ERR(clk_xtal),
> +				     "Failed to get the 'xtal' clock\n");
> +
> +	if (private_data->use_xtal_clk) {
> +		hw = devm_clk_hw_register_divider_table(port->dev,
> +							CLK_NAME(xtal_div),
> +							__clk_get_name(clk_baud),
> +							CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT,
> +							port->membase + AML_UART_REG5,
> +							26, 2,
> +							CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY,
> +							xtal_div_table, NULL);
> +		if (IS_ERR(hw))
> +			return PTR_ERR(hw);
> +
> +		use_xtal_mux_parents[1].hw = hw;
> +	} else {
> +		hw = devm_clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(port->dev,
> +						       CLK_NAME(clk81_div4),
> +						       __clk_get_name(clk_baud),
> +						       CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT,
> +						       1, 4);
> +		if (IS_ERR(hw))
> +			return PTR_ERR(hw);
> +
> +		use_xtal_mux_parents[0].hw = hw;
> +	}

Contradiction with previous series.
In the previous series we could clearly see that gxbb did not have the
/4 divider. It did not have bits 26 and 27 either.

Now gxbb get the /4 divider. It operated correctly without it so far, so
this is rather suspicious. Could you please comment on this ?

>  
> -	port->uartclk = clk_get_rate(clk_baud);
> +	hw = __devm_clk_hw_register_mux(port->dev, NULL,
> +					CLK_NAME(use_xtal),
> +					ARRAY_SIZE(use_xtal_mux_parents),
> +					NULL, NULL,
> +					use_xtal_mux_parents,
> +					CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> +					port->membase + AML_UART_REG5,
> +					24, 0x1,
> +					CLK_MUX_READ_ONLY,
> +					NULL, NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(hw))
> +		return PTR_ERR(hw);
> +
> +	port->uartclk = clk_hw_get_rate(hw);
> +
> +	hw = devm_clk_hw_register_divider(port->dev,
> +					  CLK_NAME(baud_div),
> +					  clk_hw_get_name(hw),
> +					  CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
> +					  port->membase + AML_UART_REG5,
> +					  0, 23,
> +					  CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST,
> +					  NULL);
> +	if (IS_ERR(hw))
> +		return PTR_ERR(hw);
> +
> +	private_data->baud_clk = clk_hw_get_clk(hw, "baud_rate");

I have already commented on the use of this function in the previous
version.

Please make sure all comments are addressed before re-posting

>  
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> +	struct meson_uart_data *private_data;
>  	struct resource *res_mem;
>  	struct uart_port *port;
>  	u32 fifosize = 64; /* Default is 64, 128 for EE UART_0 */
> @@ -716,18 +783,20 @@ static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return -EBUSY;
>  	}
>  
> -	port = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct uart_port), GFP_KERNEL);
> -	if (!port)
> +	private_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*private_data),
> +				    GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!private_data)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> +	if (device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev))
> +		private_data->use_xtal_clk = true;
> +
> +	port = &private_data->port;
> +
>  	port->membase = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res_mem);
>  	if (IS_ERR(port->membase))
>  		return PTR_ERR(port->membase);
>  
> -	ret = meson_uart_probe_clocks(pdev, port);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
>  	port->iotype = UPIO_MEM;
>  	port->mapbase = res_mem->start;
>  	port->mapsize = resource_size(res_mem);
> @@ -740,7 +809,11 @@ static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	port->x_char = 0;
>  	port->ops = &meson_uart_ops;
>  	port->fifosize = fifosize;
> +	port->private_data = private_data;

port has private_data
private_data has port

Is it really necessary to have both ... looks to me that port in
private_data is overkill

>  
> +	ret = meson_uart_probe_clocks(port);
> +	if (ret)
> +		return ret;
>  	meson_ports[pdev->id] = port;
>  	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, port);
>  
> @@ -766,10 +839,39 @@ static int meson_uart_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  }
>  
>  static const struct of_device_id meson_uart_dt_match[] = {
> -	{ .compatible = "amlogic,meson6-uart" },
> -	{ .compatible = "amlogic,meson8-uart" },
> -	{ .compatible = "amlogic,meson8b-uart" },
> -	{ .compatible = "amlogic,meson-gx-uart" },
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "amlogic,meson6-uart",
> +		.data = (void *)false,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "amlogic,meson8-uart",
> +		.data = (void *)false,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "amlogic,meson8b-uart",
> +		.data = (void *)false,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "amlogic,meson-gxbb-uart",
> +		.data = (void *)false,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "amlogic,meson-gxl-uart",
> +		.data = (void *)true,
> +	},
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "amlogic,meson-g12a-uart",
> +		.data = (void *)true,
> +	},
> +	/*
> +	 * deprecated, don't use anymore because it doesn't differentiate
> +	 * between GXBB, GXL and G12A which have different revisions
> +	 * of the UART IP.
> +	 */
> +	{
> +		.compatible = "amlogic,meson-gx-uart",
> +		.data = (void *)false,
> +	},
>  	{ /* sentinel */ },
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, meson_uart_dt_match);

Powered by blists - more mailing lists