lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220110185100.6c4c226c@gandalf.local.home>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jan 2022 18:51:00 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x2c44): Section
 mismatch in reference from the function trace_define_generic_fields() to
 the variable .init.data:initcall_level_names

On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 01:12:12 +0800
kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:

> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<):
> 
> >> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x2c44): Section mismatch in reference from the function trace_define_generic_fields() to the variable .init.data:initcall_level_names  
> The function trace_define_generic_fields() references
> the variable __initdata initcall_level_names.
> This is often because trace_define_generic_fields lacks a __initdata
> annotation or the annotation of initcall_level_names is wrong.

I keep getting this, and it looks like a bug in the compiler not the kernel
code.

We have:

int filter_assign_type(const char *type)
{
	if (strstr(type, "__data_loc") && strstr(type, "char"))
		return FILTER_DYN_STRING;

	if (strstr(type, "__rel_loc") && strstr(type, "char"))
		return FILTER_RDYN_STRING;

	if (strchr(type, '[') && strstr(type, "char"))
		return FILTER_STATIC_STRING;

	if (strcmp(type, "char *") == 0 || strcmp(type, "const char *") == 0)
		return FILTER_PTR_STRING;

	return FILTER_OTHER;
}

static int __trace_define_field(struct list_head *head, const char *type,
				const char *name, int offset, int size,
				int is_signed, int filter_type)
{
	struct ftrace_event_field *field;

	field = kmem_cache_alloc(field_cachep, GFP_TRACE);
	if (!field)
		return -ENOMEM;

	field->name = name;
	field->type = type;

	if (filter_type == FILTER_OTHER)
		field->filter_type = filter_assign_type(type);
	else
		field->filter_type = filter_type;

	field->offset = offset;
	field->size = size;
	field->is_signed = is_signed;

	list_add(&field->link, head);

	return 0;
}

#define is_signed_type(type)	(((type)(-1)) < (type)1)

static LIST_HEAD(ftrace_generic_fields);

#define __generic_field(type, item, filter_type)			\
	ret = __trace_define_field(&ftrace_generic_fields, #type,	\
				   #item, 0, 0, is_signed_type(type),	\
				   filter_type);			\
	if (ret)							\
		return ret;


static int trace_define_generic_fields(void)
{
	int ret;

	__generic_field(int, CPU, FILTER_CPU);
	__generic_field(int, cpu, FILTER_CPU);
	__generic_field(char *, COMM, FILTER_COMM);
	__generic_field(char *, comm, FILTER_COMM);

	return ret;
}


Please tell me where initcall_level_names is being referenced?

Either fix the compiler or tell me exactly what the bug is. Otherwise, stop
sending me this.

-- Steve

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ