linux-kernel - Re: [kbuild-all] Re: WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x2c44): Section mismatch in reference from the function trace_define_generic_fields() to the variable .init.data:initcall_level

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cea7d17b-1994-e2cb-7580-4bd2f287ebdd@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Jan 2022 16:32:38 +0800
From:   "Chen, Rong A" <rong.a.chen@...el.com>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [kbuild-all] Re: WARNING: modpost:
 vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x2c44): Section mismatch in reference from the
 function trace_define_generic_fields() to the variable
 .init.data:initcall_level_names



On 1/11/2022 7:51 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 01:12:12 +0800
> kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com> wrote:
> 
>> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>, old ones prefixed by <<):
>>
>>>> WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text.unlikely+0x2c44): Section mismatch in reference from the function trace_define_generic_fields() to the variable .init.data:initcall_level_names
>> The function trace_define_generic_fields() references
>> the variable __initdata initcall_level_names.
>> This is often because trace_define_generic_fields lacks a __initdata
>> annotation or the annotation of initcall_level_names is wrong.
> 
> I keep getting this, and it looks like a bug in the compiler not the kernel
> code.
> 
> We have:
> 
> int filter_assign_type(const char *type)
> {
> 	if (strstr(type, "__data_loc") && strstr(type, "char"))
> 		return FILTER_DYN_STRING;
> 
> 	if (strstr(type, "__rel_loc") && strstr(type, "char"))
> 		return FILTER_RDYN_STRING;
> 
> 	if (strchr(type, '[') && strstr(type, "char"))
> 		return FILTER_STATIC_STRING;
> 
> 	if (strcmp(type, "char *") == 0 || strcmp(type, "const char *") == 0)
> 		return FILTER_PTR_STRING;
> 
> 	return FILTER_OTHER;
> }
> 
> static int __trace_define_field(struct list_head *head, const char *type,
> 				const char *name, int offset, int size,
> 				int is_signed, int filter_type)
> {
> 	struct ftrace_event_field *field;
> 
> 	field = kmem_cache_alloc(field_cachep, GFP_TRACE);
> 	if (!field)
> 		return -ENOMEM;
> 
> 	field->name = name;
> 	field->type = type;
> 
> 	if (filter_type == FILTER_OTHER)
> 		field->filter_type = filter_assign_type(type);
> 	else
> 		field->filter_type = filter_type;
> 
> 	field->offset = offset;
> 	field->size = size;
> 	field->is_signed = is_signed;
> 
> 	list_add(&field->link, head);
> 
> 	return 0;
> }
> 
> #define is_signed_type(type)	(((type)(-1)) < (type)1)
> 
> static LIST_HEAD(ftrace_generic_fields);
> 
> #define __generic_field(type, item, filter_type)			\
> 	ret = __trace_define_field(&ftrace_generic_fields, #type,	\
> 				   #item, 0, 0, is_signed_type(type),	\
> 				   filter_type);			\
> 	if (ret)							\
> 		return ret;
> 
> 
> static int trace_define_generic_fields(void)
> {
> 	int ret;
> 
> 	__generic_field(int, CPU, FILTER_CPU);
> 	__generic_field(int, cpu, FILTER_CPU);
> 	__generic_field(char *, COMM, FILTER_COMM);
> 	__generic_field(char *, comm, FILTER_COMM);
> 
> 	return ret;
> }
> 
> 
> Please tell me where initcall_level_names is being referenced?
> 
> Either fix the compiler or tell me exactly what the bug is. Otherwise, stop
> sending me this.
> 
> -- Steve

Hi Steve,

I'm not familiar with the code, the warning can be silenced with the 
below change:

--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
@@ -162,7 +162,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(trace_define_field);
         if (ret)                                                        \
                 return ret;

-static int trace_define_generic_fields(void)
+static __init int trace_define_generic_fields(void)
  {
         int ret;

@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static int trace_define_generic_fields(void)
         return ret;
  }

-static int trace_define_common_fields(void)
+static __init int trace_define_common_fields(void)
  {
         int ret;
         struct trace_entry ent;

If the warning can't be fixed, we'll add the warning to the ignore list.

Best Regards,
Rong Chen