[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YdxA5bwcwyJXcPDl@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:21:25 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     "Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp)" <quic_c_skakit@...cinc.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, swboyd@...omium.org,
        collinsd@...eaurora.org, subbaram@...eaurora.org,
        Das Srinagesh <gurus@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/6] dt-bindings: regulator: Add pm8008 regulator
 bindings
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 06:42:08PM +0530, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) wrote:
> To understand how other upstream mfd drivers are handling this I've gone
> through some of them. Taking one example, mfd/stpmic1.c is a pmicĀ  mfd
> device which has a regulators sub-node with separate compatible, and has the
> parent supplies listed under the regulators node.
There are some devices that did get merged doing this, that doesn't mean
it's a great idea though.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
