linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V4 2/6] dt-bindings: regulator: Add pm8008 regulator bindings

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 11 Jan 2022 17:45:16 +0530
From:   "Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp)" <quic_c_skakit@...cinc.com>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        <collinsd@...eaurora.org>, <subbaram@...eaurora.org>,
        Das Srinagesh <gurus@...eaurora.org>,
        <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Lee Jones" <lee.jones@...aro.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 2/6] dt-bindings: regulator: Add pm8008 regulator
 bindings


On 1/10/2022 7:51 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 06:42:08PM +0530, Satya Priya Kakitapalli (Temp) wrote:
>
>> To understand how other upstream mfd drivers are handling this I've gone
>> through some of them. Taking one example, mfd/stpmic1.c is a pmic  mfd
>> device which has a regulators sub-node with separate compatible, and has the
>> parent supplies listed under the regulators node.
> There are some devices that did get merged doing this, that doesn't mean
> it's a great idea though.

In that case, it would be helpful if you could provide an example which 
has the design you suggested.