lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAP-5=fWZWMweYhWvv1vr6quZe=ZJrhF_WEXqbELVitzofBcQrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:16:16 -0800
From:   Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>
Cc:     Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Kajol Jain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Paul A . Clarke" <pc@...ibm.com>,
        Riccardo Mancini <rickyman7@...il.com>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Vineet Singh <vineet.singh@...el.com>,
        James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, zhengjun.xing@...el.com,
        eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 48/48] perf cpumap: Give CPUs their own type.

On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 11:50 AM Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Em Tue, Jan 04, 2022 at 10:13:51PM -0800, Ian Rogers escreveu:
> > A common problem is confusing CPU map indices with the CPU, by wrapping
> > the CPU with a struct then this is avoided. This approach is similar to
> > atomic_t.
>
> This one needed this to build with BUILD_BPF_SKEL=1, please check, I'll
> soon push this to tmp.perf/perf_cpu so that you can take a look and test
> it.


Thanks Arnaldo, I did eye-ball one issue where cpu_map__default_new's
behavior would be impacted (nr would be 1 rather than nr_cpus). The
fix is:

--- a/tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c
+++ b/tools/lib/perf/cpumap.c
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ static struct perf_cpu_map *perf_cpu_map__alloc(int nr_cpus)
        if (!cpus)
                return NULL;

-       cpus->nr = 1;
+       cpus->nr = nr_cpus;
        refcount_set(&cpus->refcnt, 1);
        return cpus;
 }

Could you add that into this patch as well?

Thanks,
Ian


> - Arnaldo
>
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c
> index 80d1a3a31052fe55..328479df5e16a638 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter.c
> @@ -540,7 +540,7 @@ static int bperf__load(struct evsel *evsel, struct target *target)
>                     filter_type == BPERF_FILTER_TGID)
>                         key = evsel->core.threads->map[i].pid;
>                 else if (filter_type == BPERF_FILTER_CPU)
> -                       key = evsel->core.cpus->map[i];
> +                       key = evsel->core.cpus->map[i].cpu;
>                 else
>                         break;
>
> @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ static int bperf_sync_counters(struct evsel *evsel)
>
>         num_cpu = all_cpu_map->nr;
>         for (i = 0; i < num_cpu; i++) {
> -               cpu = all_cpu_map->map[i];
> +               cpu = all_cpu_map->map[i].cpu;
>                 bperf_trigger_reading(evsel->bperf_leader_prog_fd, cpu);
>         }
>         return 0;
> @@ -605,7 +605,7 @@ static int bperf__disable(struct evsel *evsel)
>  static int bperf__read(struct evsel *evsel)
>  {
>         struct bperf_follower_bpf *skel = evsel->follower_skel;
> -       __u32 num_cpu_bpf = cpu__max_cpu();
> +       __u32 num_cpu_bpf = cpu__max_cpu().cpu;
>         struct bpf_perf_event_value values[num_cpu_bpf];
>         int reading_map_fd, err = 0;
>         __u32 i;
> @@ -615,6 +615,7 @@ static int bperf__read(struct evsel *evsel)
>         reading_map_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.accum_readings);
>
>         for (i = 0; i < bpf_map__max_entries(skel->maps.accum_readings); i++) {
> +               struct perf_cpu entry;
>                 __u32 cpu;
>
>                 err = bpf_map_lookup_elem(reading_map_fd, &i, values);
> @@ -624,14 +625,15 @@ static int bperf__read(struct evsel *evsel)
>                 case BPERF_FILTER_GLOBAL:
>                         assert(i == 0);
>
> -                       perf_cpu_map__for_each_cpu(cpu, j, all_cpu_map) {
> +                       perf_cpu_map__for_each_cpu(entry, j, all_cpu_map) {
> +                               cpu = entry.cpu;
>                                 perf_counts(evsel->counts, cpu, 0)->val = values[cpu].counter;
>                                 perf_counts(evsel->counts, cpu, 0)->ena = values[cpu].enabled;
>                                 perf_counts(evsel->counts, cpu, 0)->run = values[cpu].running;
>                         }
>                         break;
>                 case BPERF_FILTER_CPU:
> -                       cpu = evsel->core.cpus->map[i];
> +                       cpu = evsel->core.cpus->map[i].cpu;
>                         perf_counts(evsel->counts, i, 0)->val = values[cpu].counter;
>                         perf_counts(evsel->counts, i, 0)->ena = values[cpu].enabled;
>                         perf_counts(evsel->counts, i, 0)->run = values[cpu].running;
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter_cgroup.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter_cgroup.c
> index cbc6c2bca488f6bf..631e34a0b66ff084 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter_cgroup.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_counter_cgroup.c
> @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static int bperf_load_program(struct evlist *evlist)
>         struct cgroup *cgrp, *leader_cgrp;
>         __u32 i, cpu;
>         __u32 nr_cpus = evlist->core.all_cpus->nr;
> -       int total_cpus = cpu__max_cpu();
> +       int total_cpus = cpu__max_cpu().cpu;
>         int map_size, map_fd;
>         int prog_fd, err;
>
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static int bperf_load_program(struct evlist *evlist)
>                         for (cpu = 0; cpu < nr_cpus; cpu++) {
>                                 int fd = FD(evsel, cpu);
>                                 __u32 idx = evsel->core.idx * total_cpus +
> -                                       evlist->core.all_cpus->map[cpu];
> +                                       evlist->core.all_cpus->map[cpu].cpu;
>
>                                 err = bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, &idx, &fd,
>                                                           BPF_ANY);
> @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static int bperf_cgrp__sync_counters(struct evlist *evlist)
>         int prog_fd = bpf_program__fd(skel->progs.trigger_read);
>
>         for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++) {
> -               cpu = evlist->core.all_cpus->map[i];
> +               cpu = evlist->core.all_cpus->map[i].cpu;
>                 bperf_trigger_reading(prog_fd, cpu);
>         }
>
> @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ static int bperf_cgrp__read(struct evsel *evsel)
>  {
>         struct evlist *evlist = evsel->evlist;
>         int i, cpu, nr_cpus = evlist->core.all_cpus->nr;
> -       int total_cpus = cpu__max_cpu();
> +       int total_cpus = cpu__max_cpu().cpu;
>         struct perf_counts_values *counts;
>         struct bpf_perf_event_value *values;
>         int reading_map_fd, err = 0;
> @@ -272,7 +272,7 @@ static int bperf_cgrp__read(struct evsel *evsel)
>                 }
>
>                 for (i = 0; i < nr_cpus; i++) {
> -                       cpu = evlist->core.all_cpus->map[i];
> +                       cpu = evlist->core.all_cpus->map[i].cpu;
>
>                         counts = perf_counts(evsel->counts, i, 0);
>                         counts->val = values[cpu].counter;
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/bpf_ftrace.c b/tools/perf/util/bpf_ftrace.c
> index 28dc4c60c7884818..d756cc66eef32ae8 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/bpf_ftrace.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/bpf_ftrace.c
> @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ int perf_ftrace__latency_prepare_bpf(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace)
>                 fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.cpu_filter);
>
>                 for (i = 0; i < ncpus; i++) {
> -                       cpu = perf_cpu_map__cpu(ftrace->evlist->core.cpus, i);
> +                       cpu = perf_cpu_map__cpu(ftrace->evlist->core.cpus, i).cpu;
>                         bpf_map_update_elem(fd, &cpu, &val, BPF_ANY);
>                 }
>         }
> @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ int perf_ftrace__latency_read_bpf(struct perf_ftrace *ftrace __maybe_unused,
>         int i, fd, err;
>         u32 idx;
>         u64 *hist;
> -       int ncpus = cpu__max_cpu();
> +       int ncpus = cpu__max_cpu().cpu;
>
>         fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.latency);
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ