lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 11 Jan 2022 11:53:19 +0530
From:   Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
CC:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof WilczyƄski <kw@...ux.com>,
        <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] PCI: keystone: Add quirk to mark AM654 RC BAR flag
 as IORESOURCE_UNSET

Hi Lorenzo,

On 04/01/22 9:27 pm, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 02:01:18PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
>> AM654 RootComplex has a hard coded 64 bit BAR of size 1MB and also has
>> both MSI and MSI-X capability in it's config space. If PCIEPORTBUS is
>> enabled, it tries to configure MSI-X and msix_mask_all() adds about 10
>> Second boot up delay when it tries to write to undefined location.
>>
>> Add quirk to mark AM654 RC BAR flag as IORESOURCE_UNSET so that
>> msix_map_region() returns NULL for Root Complex and avoid un-desirable
>> writes to MSI-X table.
> 
> I don't think this is the right fix (it is not even a fix, just a
> plaster to workaround an issue).
> 
> What do you mean by "writing to an undefined location" ?
> 
> What does "a hard coded BAR" mean ?
> 
> What happens if we _rightly_ write into it (ie to size it) ?

There are two parts w.r.t setting the BAR; one is during the configuration and
the other is during the enumeration.
i) During the configuration, the size of the BAR is configured and the inbound
ATU is configured to map the BAR to a physical memory.
ii) During the enumeration, the size of the BAR is obtained and an address is
allocated and programmed in the BAR.

In the case of RC, for (i) above, the BAR size is configured as '0'
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-host.c#n556
and the inbound ATU is not programmed at all.

However, in the case of AM654, the HW configures BAR0 for a fixed size of 1MB
(irrespective of what SW programmed in [i]). While this was done more for a
endpoint usecase, since the same IP is configured for both RC mode and EP mode,
the fixed BAR size is seen with RC mode as well. AM654 also has MSI-X capability
for RC mode (the IP should have been ideally configured to have MSI-X capability
for EP mode). This results in PCIEPORTBUS doing some undesired access in
msix_mask_all().

Here I configure IORESOURCE_UNSET so that memory is not allocated for RC BAR.

Thank You,
Kishon


> 
> Lorenzo
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c | 8 +++++++-
>>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
>> index 52d20fe17ee9..73e6626a0d8f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-keystone.c
>> @@ -557,8 +557,14 @@ static void ks_pcie_quirk(struct pci_dev *dev)
>>  		{ 0, },
>>  	};
>>  
>> -	if (pci_is_root_bus(bus))
>> +	if (pci_is_root_bus(bus)) {
>>  		bridge = dev;
>> +		if (pci_match_id(am6_pci_devids, bridge)) {
>> +			struct resource *r = &dev->resource[0];
>> +
>> +			r->flags |= IORESOURCE_UNSET;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>>  
>>  	/* look for the host bridge */
>>  	while (!pci_is_root_bus(bus)) {
>> -- 
>> 2.17.1
>>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ