[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <244238061.248369.1641886066066.JavaMail.zimbra@nod.at>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 08:27:46 +0100 (CET)
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: chengzhihao1 <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
Cc: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
mcoquelin stm32 <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
kirill shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/15] ubi: fastmap: Add all fastmap pebs into
'ai->fastmap' when fm->used_blocks>=2
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "chengzhihao1" <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
> An: "richard" <richard@....at>
> CC: "Miquel Raynal" <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, "Vignesh Raghavendra" <vigneshr@...com>, "mcoquelin stm32"
> <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>, "kirill shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>, "Sascha Hauer"
> <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>, "linux-mtd" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 11. Januar 2022 03:48:24
> Betreff: Re: [PATCH v6 12/15] ubi: fastmap: Add all fastmap pebs into 'ai->fastmap' when fm->used_blocks>=2
> Hi Richard,
>> scan_ai->fastmap may contain also old fastmap PEBs.
>> In the area < UBI_FM_MAX_START you can find outdated fastmap PEBs.
>> e.g. after power-cut.
>> That's why scan_ai->fastmap is copied into ai->fastmap.
>> Later in ubi_wl_init() these outdated PEBs will get erased.
>> So, you cannot remove this code.
> I thought old fastmap PEBs(async erase works in ubi_update_fastmap())
> will be counted into erase PEBs in the next attaching process, because I
> saw following code snippet in ubi_write_fastmap():
> 1260 list_for_each_entry(ubi_wrk, &ubi->works, list) {
>
> 1261 if (ubi_is_erase_work(ubi_wrk)) {
>
> 1262 wl_e = ubi_wrk->e;
>
> 1263 ubi_assert(wl_e);
>
> 1264
>
> 1265 fec = (struct ubi_fm_ec *)(fm_raw +
> fm_pos);
> 1266
>
> 1267 fec->pnum = cpu_to_be32(wl_e->pnum);
>
> 1268 set_seen(ubi, wl_e->pnum, seen_pebs);
>
> 1269 fec->ec = cpu_to_be32(wl_e->ec);
>
> 1270
>
> 1271 erase_peb_count++;
>
> 1272 fm_pos += sizeof(*fec);
>
> 1273 ubi_assert(fm_pos <= ubi->fm_size);
>
> 1274 }
>
> 1275 }
>
> 1276 fmh->erase_peb_count = cpu_to_be32(erase_peb_count);
> Half-writing on fastmap will be recognized in scanning, and UBI
> fallbacks full scanning, So, I come up with two situations:
> 1. power-cut before new fastmap written, the old fastmap is completely
> saved until next attaching, and some free PEBs are written with new
> fastmap data. Luckly, fastmap anchor PEB's vid header is written first
> of all, bad fastmap will be returned by ubi_attach_fastmap() in next
> attaching.
> 2. power-cut after new fastmap written, the old fastmap PEBs will be
> added into 'ai->erase' list in next attaching.
> Did I miss other possible circumstances?
In ubi_wl_init() there is another corner case documented:
/*
* The fastmap update code might not find a free PEB for
* writing the fastmap anchor to and then reuses the
* current fastmap anchor PEB. When this PEB gets erased
* and a power cut happens before it is written again we
* must make sure that the fastmap attach code doesn't
* find any outdated fastmap anchors, hence we erase the
* outdated fastmap anchor PEBs synchronously here.
*/
if (aeb->vol_id == UBI_FM_SB_VOLUME_ID)
sync = true;
So ubi_wl_init() makes sure that all old fastmap anchors get erased before UBI
starts to operate. With your change this is no longer satisfied.
Thanks,
//richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists