[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <420c7567-8926-2e8b-4da0-a9bfc8379642@huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 19:44:49 +0800
From: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
CC: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
mcoquelin stm32 <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
"kirill shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
linux-mtd <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 12/15] ubi: fastmap: Add all fastmap pebs into
'ai->fastmap' when fm->used_blocks>=2
Hi Richard,
> In ubi_wl_init() there is another corner case documented:
> /*
> * The fastmap update code might not find a free PEB for
> * writing the fastmap anchor to and then reuses the
> * current fastmap anchor PEB. When this PEB gets erased
> * and a power cut happens before it is written again we
> * must make sure that the fastmap attach code doesn't
> * find any outdated fastmap anchors, hence we erase the
> * outdated fastmap anchor PEBs synchronously here.
> */
> if (aeb->vol_id == UBI_FM_SB_VOLUME_ID)
> sync = true;
>
> So ubi_wl_init() makes sure that all old fastmap anchors get erased before UBI
> starts to operate. With your change this is no longer satisfied
I seem to understand the another case. But I'm still confused that why
outdated fastmap PEBs cannot be erased. When UBI comes to this point, it
means UBI is attached by **full scanning mode**, scan_fast() returns two
values:
UBI_NO_FASTMAP: scan all pebs from pnum UBI_FM_MAX_START, ai is
assigned with scan_ai, at last, all fastmap pebs are added into
'ai->fastmap'
UBI_BAD_FASTMAP: scan all pebs from pnum 0, all fastmap pebs are
added into 'ai->fastmap'
Powered by blists - more mailing lists