lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <61768711-a68d-db9a-f049-61fa25808183@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:34:46 +0800
From:   Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
To:     Eric Auger <eauger@...hat.com>, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Cc:     maz@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 13/21] KVM: arm64: Impment SDEI event delivery

Hi Eric,

On 11/10/21 6:58 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
> s/Impment/Implement in the commit title
> 
> On 8/15/21 2:13 AM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> This implement kvm_sdei_deliver() to support SDEI event delivery.
>> The function is called when the request (KVM_REQ_SDEI) is raised.
>> The following rules are taken according to the SDEI specification:
>>
>>     * x0 - x17 are saved. All of them are cleared except the following
>>       registered:
> s/registered/registers
>>       x0: number SDEI event to be delivered
> s/number SDEI event/SDEI event number
>>       x1: parameter associated with the SDEI event
> user arg?

The commit log will be improved in next respin.

>>       x2: PC of the interrupted context
>>       x3: PState of the interrupted context
>>
>>     * PC is set to the handler of the SDEI event, which was provided
>>       during its registration. PState is modified accordingly.
>>
>>     * SDEI event with critical priority can preempt those with normal
>>       priority.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  1 +
>>   arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_sdei.h |  1 +
>>   arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c              |  3 ++
>>   arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c             | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   4 files changed, 89 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index aedf901e1ec7..46f363aa6524 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@
>>   #define KVM_REQ_RECORD_STEAL	KVM_ARCH_REQ(3)
>>   #define KVM_REQ_RELOAD_GICv4	KVM_ARCH_REQ(4)
>>   #define KVM_REQ_RELOAD_PMU	KVM_ARCH_REQ(5)
>> +#define KVM_REQ_SDEI		KVM_ARCH_REQ(6)
>>   
>>   #define KVM_DIRTY_LOG_MANUAL_CAPS   (KVM_DIRTY_LOG_MANUAL_PROTECT_ENABLE | \
>>   				     KVM_DIRTY_LOG_INITIALLY_SET)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_sdei.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_sdei.h
>> index b0abc13a0256..7f5f5ad689e6 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_sdei.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_sdei.h
>> @@ -112,6 +112,7 @@ KVM_SDEI_FLAG_FUNC(enabled)
>>   void kvm_sdei_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
>>   void kvm_sdei_create_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>   int kvm_sdei_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> +void kvm_sdei_deliver(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>   void kvm_sdei_destroy_vcpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>   void kvm_sdei_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
>>   
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> index 2f021aa41632..0c3db1ef1ba9 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
>> @@ -689,6 +689,9 @@ static void check_vcpu_requests(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>   		if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_VCPU_RESET, vcpu))
>>   			kvm_reset_vcpu(vcpu);
>>   
>> +		if (kvm_check_request(KVM_REQ_SDEI, vcpu))
>> +			kvm_sdei_deliver(vcpu);
>> +
>>   		/*
>>   		 * Clear IRQ_PENDING requests that were made to guarantee
>>   		 * that a VCPU sees new virtual interrupts.
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c
>> index 62efee2b67b8..b5d6d1ed3858 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c
>> @@ -671,6 +671,90 @@ int kvm_sdei_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>>   	return 1;
>>   }
>>   
>> +void kvm_sdei_deliver(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> +	struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>> +	struct kvm_sdei_kvm *ksdei = kvm->arch.sdei;
>> +	struct kvm_sdei_vcpu *vsdei = vcpu->arch.sdei;
>> +	struct kvm_sdei_event *kse = NULL;
>> +	struct kvm_sdei_kvm_event *kske = NULL;
>> +	struct kvm_sdei_vcpu_event *ksve = NULL;
>> +	struct kvm_sdei_vcpu_regs *regs = NULL;
>> +	unsigned long pstate;
>> +	int index = 0;
>> +
>> +	/* Sanity check */
>> +	if (!(ksdei && vsdei))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	/* The critical event can't be preempted */
> move the comment after the spin_lock

Ok.

>> +	spin_lock(&vsdei->lock);
>> +	if (vsdei->critical_event)
>> +		goto unlock;
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * The normal event can be preempted by the critical event.
>> +	 * However, the normal event can't be preempted by another
>> +	 * normal event.
>> +	 */
>> +	ksve = list_first_entry_or_null(&vsdei->critical_events,
>> +			struct kvm_sdei_vcpu_event, link);
>> +	if (!ksve && !vsdei->normal_event) {
>> +		ksve = list_first_entry_or_null(&vsdei->normal_events,
>> +				struct kvm_sdei_vcpu_event, link);
>> +	}
> At this stage of the review the struct kvm_sdei_vcpu_event lifecycle is
> not known.
> 

The object (kvm_sdei_vcpu_event) is queued to the target vCPU for dispatch.
The multiple and same SDEI events can be queued to one target vCPU. In this
case, the objecct is reused.

>>>From the dispatcher pseudocode I understand you check
> 
> ((IsCriticalEvent(E) and !CriticalEventRunning(P, C)) ||
> (!IsCriticalEvent(E) and !EventRunning(P, C)))
> 
> but I can't check you take care of
> IsEnabled(E) and
> IsEventTarget(E, P)
> IsUnmasked(P)
> 
> Either you should shash with 18/21 or at least you should add comments.

The additional conditions are checked when the event is injected in PATCH[v4 18/21].
I think it's good idead to squash them.

>> +
>> +	if (!ksve)
>> +		goto unlock;
>> +
>> +	kske = ksve->kske;
>> +	kse = kske->kse;
>> +	if (kse->state.priority == SDEI_EVENT_PRIORITY_CRITICAL) {
>> +		vsdei->critical_event = ksve;
>> +		vsdei->state.critical_num = ksve->state.num;
>> +		regs = &vsdei->state.critical_regs;
>> +	} else {
>> +		vsdei->normal_event = ksve;
>> +		vsdei->state.normal_num = ksve->state.num;
>> +		regs = &vsdei->state.normal_regs;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	/* Save registers: x0 -> x17, PC, PState */
>> +	for (index = 0; index < ARRAY_SIZE(regs->regs); index++)
>> +		regs->regs[index] = vcpu_get_reg(vcpu, index);
>> +
>> +	regs->pc = *vcpu_pc(vcpu);
>> +	regs->pstate = *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Inject SDEI event: x0 -> x3, PC, PState. We needn't take lock
>> +	 * for the KVM event as it can't be destroyed because of its
>> +	 * reference count.
>> +	 */
>> +	for (index = 0; index < ARRAY_SIZE(regs->regs); index++)
>> +		vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, index, 0);
>> +
>> +	index = (kse->state.type == SDEI_EVENT_TYPE_PRIVATE) ?
>> +		vcpu->vcpu_idx : 0;
>> +	vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 0, kske->state.num);
>> +	vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 1, kske->state.params[index]);
>> +	vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 2, regs->pc);
>> +	vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, 3, regs->pstate);
>> +
>> +	pstate = regs->pstate;
>> +	pstate |= (PSR_D_BIT | PSR_A_BIT | PSR_I_BIT | PSR_F_BIT);
>> +	pstate &= ~PSR_MODE_MASK;
>> +	pstate |= PSR_MODE_EL1h;
>> +	pstate &= ~PSR_MODE32_BIT;
>> +
>> +	vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, regs->pstate, SPSR_EL1);
>> +	*vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = pstate;
>> +	*vcpu_pc(vcpu) = kske->state.entries[index];
>> +
>> +unlock:
>> +	spin_unlock(&vsdei->lock);
>> +}
>> +
>>   void kvm_sdei_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>>   {
>>   	struct kvm_sdei_kvm *ksdei;
>>

Thanks,
Gavin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ