| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <fdb013e7-10a1-58de-92aa-3ab9d25346fa@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 14:43:36 +0800
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
To: Eric Auger <eauger@...hat.com>, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Cc: maz@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, will@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 14/21] KVM: arm64: Support SDEI_EVENT_{COMPLETE,
COMPLETE_AND_RESUME} hypercall
Hi Eric,
On 11/10/21 6:58 PM, Eric Auger wrote:
> On 8/15/21 2:13 AM, Gavin Shan wrote:
>> This supports SDEI_EVENT_{COMPLETE, COMPLETE_AND_RESUME} hypercall.
>> They are used by the guest to notify the completion of the SDEI
>> event in the handler. The registers are changed according to the
>> SDEI specification as below:
>>
>> * x0 - x17, PC and PState are restored to what values we had in
>> the interrupted context.
>>
>> * If it's SDEI_EVENT_COMPLETE_AND_RESUME hypercall, IRQ exception
>> is injected.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 1 +
>> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c | 7 +++
>> arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c | 27 ++++++++++
>> arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 5 files changed, 111 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
>> index fd418955e31e..923b4d08ea9a 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
>> @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ bool kvm_condition_valid32(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> void kvm_skip_instr32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>>
>> void kvm_inject_undefined(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> +void kvm_inject_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> void kvm_inject_vabt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>> void kvm_inject_dabt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long addr);
>> void kvm_inject_pabt(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned long addr);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> index 46f363aa6524..1824f7e1f9ab 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
>> @@ -437,6 +437,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>> #define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA32_UND (0 << 9)
>> #define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA32_IABT (1 << 9)
>> #define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA32_DABT (2 << 9)
>> +#define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA32_IRQ (3 << 9)
>> /* For AArch64: */
>> #define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_ELx_SYNC (0 << 9)
>> #define KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_ELx_IRQ (1 << 9)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
>> index 0418399e0a20..ef458207d152 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/exception.c
>> @@ -310,6 +310,9 @@ static void kvm_inject_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> case KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA32_DABT:
>> enter_exception32(vcpu, PSR_AA32_MODE_ABT, 16);
>> break;
>> + case KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA32_IRQ:
>> + enter_exception32(vcpu, PSR_AA32_MODE_IRQ, 4);
>> + break;
>> default:
>> /* Err... */
>> break;
>> @@ -320,6 +323,10 @@ static void kvm_inject_exception(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_EL1):
>> enter_exception64(vcpu, PSR_MODE_EL1h, except_type_sync);
>> break;
>> + case (KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_ELx_IRQ |
>> + KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_EL1):
>> + enter_exception64(vcpu, PSR_MODE_EL1h, except_type_irq);
>> + break;
>> default:
>> /*
>> * Only EL1_SYNC makes sense so far, EL2_{SYNC,IRQ}
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
>> index b47df73e98d7..3a8c55867d2f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/inject_fault.c
>> @@ -66,6 +66,13 @@ static void inject_undef64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> vcpu_write_sys_reg(vcpu, esr, ESR_EL1);
>> }
>>
>> +static void inject_irq64(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + vcpu->arch.flags |= (KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_EL1 |
>> + KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA64_ELx_IRQ |
>> + KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION);
>> +}
>> +
>> #define DFSR_FSC_EXTABT_LPAE 0x10
>> #define DFSR_FSC_EXTABT_nLPAE 0x08
>> #define DFSR_LPAE BIT(9)
>> @@ -77,6 +84,12 @@ static void inject_undef32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION);
>> }
>>
>> +static void inject_irq32(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + vcpu->arch.flags |= (KVM_ARM64_EXCEPT_AA32_IRQ |
>> + KVM_ARM64_PENDING_EXCEPTION);
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * Modelled after TakeDataAbortException() and TakePrefetchAbortException
>> * pseudocode.
>> @@ -160,6 +173,20 @@ void kvm_inject_undefined(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> inject_undef64(vcpu);
>> }
>>
>> +/**
>> + * kvm_inject_irq - inject an IRQ into the guest
>> + *
>> + * It is assumed that this code is called from the VCPU thread and that the
>> + * VCPU therefore is not currently executing guest code.
>> + */
>> +void kvm_inject_irq(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> +{
>> + if (vcpu_el1_is_32bit(vcpu))
>> + inject_irq32(vcpu);
>> + else
>> + inject_irq64(vcpu);
>> +}
>> +
>> void kvm_set_sei_esr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 esr)
>> {
>> vcpu_set_vsesr(vcpu, esr & ESR_ELx_ISS_MASK);
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c
>> index b5d6d1ed3858..1e8e213c9d70 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sdei.c
>> @@ -308,6 +308,75 @@ static unsigned long kvm_sdei_hypercall_context(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> +static unsigned long kvm_sdei_hypercall_complete(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>> + bool resume)
>> +{
>> + struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>> + struct kvm_sdei_kvm *ksdei = kvm->arch.sdei;
>> + struct kvm_sdei_vcpu *vsdei = vcpu->arch.sdei;
>> + struct kvm_sdei_kvm_event *kske = NULL;
>> + struct kvm_sdei_vcpu_event *ksve = NULL;
>> + struct kvm_sdei_vcpu_regs *regs;
>> + unsigned long ret = SDEI_SUCCESS;
> for the RESUME you never seem to read resume_addr arg? How does it work?
> I don't get the irq injection path. Please could you explain?
The guest kernel uses COMPLETE and COMPLETE_AND_RESUME hypercalls to notify the
SDEI event has been acknoledged by it. The difference between them is COMPLETE_AND_RESUME
fires the pending interrupts, but COMPLETE doesn't.
>> + int index;
>> +
>> + /* Sanity check */
>> + if (!(ksdei && vsdei)) {
>> + ret = SDEI_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&vsdei->lock);
>> + if (vsdei->critical_event) {
>> + ksve = vsdei->critical_event;
>> + regs = &vsdei->state.critical_regs;
>> + vsdei->critical_event = NULL;
>> + vsdei->state.critical_num = KVM_SDEI_INVALID_NUM;
>> + } else if (vsdei->normal_event) {
>> + ksve = vsdei->normal_event;
>> + regs = &vsdei->state.normal_regs;
>> + vsdei->normal_event = NULL;
>> + vsdei->state.normal_num = KVM_SDEI_INVALID_NUM;
>> + } else {
>> + ret = SDEI_DENIED;
>> + goto unlock;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Restore registers: x0 -> x17, PC, PState */
>> + for (index = 0; index < ARRAY_SIZE(regs->regs); index++)
>> + vcpu_set_reg(vcpu, index, regs->regs[index]);
>> +
>> + *vcpu_cpsr(vcpu) = regs->pstate;
>> + *vcpu_pc(vcpu) = regs->pc;
>> +
>> + /* Inject interrupt if needed */
>> + if (resume)
>> + kvm_inject_irq(vcpu);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Update state. We needn't take lock in order to update the KVM
>> + * event state as it's not destroyed because of the reference
>> + * count.
>> + */
>> + kske = ksve->kske;
>> + ksve->state.refcount--;
>> + kske->state.refcount--;
> why double --?
On each SDEI event is queued for delivery, both reference count are increased. I guess
it's a bit confusing. I will change in next revision:
ksve->state.refcount: Increased on each SDEI event is queued for delivered
kske->state.refcount: Increased on each @ksve is created
>> + if (!ksve->state.refcount) {
> why not using a struct kref directly?
The reason is kref isn't friendly to userspace. This field (@refcount) needs to be
migrated :)
>> + list_del(&ksve->link);
>> + kfree(ksve);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Make another request if there is pending event */
>> + if (!(list_empty(&vsdei->critical_events) &&
>> + list_empty(&vsdei->normal_events)))
>> + kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_SDEI, vcpu);
>> +
>> +unlock:
>> + spin_unlock(&vsdei->lock);
>> +out:
>> + return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> static unsigned long kvm_sdei_hypercall_unregister(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> {
>> struct kvm *kvm = vcpu->kvm;
>> @@ -628,7 +697,13 @@ int kvm_sdei_hypercall(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>> ret = kvm_sdei_hypercall_context(vcpu);
>> break;
>> case SDEI_1_0_FN_SDEI_EVENT_COMPLETE:
>> + has_result = false;
>> + ret = kvm_sdei_hypercall_complete(vcpu, false);
>> + break;
>> case SDEI_1_0_FN_SDEI_EVENT_COMPLETE_AND_RESUME:
>> + has_result = false;
>> + ret = kvm_sdei_hypercall_complete(vcpu, true);
>> + break;
>> case SDEI_1_0_FN_SDEI_EVENT_UNREGISTER:
>> ret = kvm_sdei_hypercall_unregister(vcpu);
>> break;
>>
Thanks,
Gavin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists