[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACPK8XfkXi6M=gzfkYcuoga6WxnzSm2+mspBt4gjop7Ytm+VCA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2022 00:51:53 +0000
From: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
To: Jammy Huang <jammy_huang@...eedtech.com>
Cc: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
OpenBMC Maillist <openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-aspeed <linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] media: aspeed: Fix no complete irq for non-64-aligned width
On Tue, 14 Dec 2021 at 04:53, Jammy Huang <jammy_huang@...eedtech.com> wrote:
>
> In ast2500, engine will stop occasionally for 1360x768.
>
> This is a bug which has been addressed, but the workaround is specific
> for 1680 only. Here we make it more complete.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jammy Huang <jammy_huang@...eedtech.com>
> ---
> drivers/media/platform/aspeed-video.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/aspeed-video.c b/drivers/media/platform/aspeed-video.c
> index 793b2adaa0f5..4d3e6b105d44 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/platform/aspeed-video.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/aspeed-video.c
> @@ -1055,18 +1055,20 @@ static void aspeed_video_set_resolution(struct aspeed_video *video)
> /* Set capture/compression frame sizes */
> aspeed_video_calc_compressed_size(video, size);
>
> - if (video->active_timings.width == 1680) {
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(act->width, 64)) {
> /*
> * This is a workaround to fix a silicon bug on A1 and A2
Please add: "a AST2500 silicon bug" so we know which A1/A2 this is
referring to.
With that added, you can add:
Reviewed-by: Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>
> * revisions. Since it doesn't break capturing operation of
> * other revisions, use it for all revisions without checking
> - * the revision ID. It picked 1728 which is a very next
> - * 64-pixels aligned value to 1680 to minimize memory bandwidth
> + * the revision ID. It picked new width which is a very next
> + * 64-pixels aligned value to minimize memory bandwidth
> * and to get better access speed from video engine.
> */
> + u32 width = ALIGN(act->width, 64);
> +
> aspeed_video_write(video, VE_CAP_WINDOW,
> - 1728 << 16 | act->height);
> - size += (1728 - 1680) * video->active_timings.height;
> + width << 16 | act->height);
> + size = width * act->height;
You could make it clearer by putting the write on one line:
aspeed_video_write(video, VE_CAP_WINDOW, width << 16 |
act->height);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists