linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5] arm64: kprobe: Enable OPTPROBE for arm64

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAgTQPUEgSf-E_GOUNY_=4Piiy0K_-5U_YVbnoMAZ94Q3ducOg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jan 2022 20:21:57 +0800
From:   Jianhua Liu <jianhua.ljh@...il.com>
To:     "liuqi (BA)" <liuqi115@...wei.com>
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Linuxarm <linuxarm@...wei.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
        "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>, robin.murphy@....com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] arm64: kprobe: Enable OPTPROBE for arm64

On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 9:31 AM liuqi (BA) <liuqi115@...wei.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2022/1/4 10:35, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> > Hi Jianhua,
> >
> > On Mon, 3 Jan 2022 17:03:33 +0800
> > Jianhua Liu <jianhua.ljh@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Qi,
> >> I have tested your patch on UNISOC s9863a.
> >> Test case "kprobe_example & kretprobe_example" is OK.
> >>
> >> Two point:
> >> 1. backtrace is not perfect.
> >>     optprobe_common does not saved frame pointer,
> >>     backtrace lacks two calls.
> >> such as for dup_mm: lack copy_process-->dup_mm
> >> dup_mm backtrace from your patch:
> >> [  832.387066] CPU: 0 PID: 296 Comm: sh Not tainted 5.16.0-rc5+ #8
> >> [  832.387078] Hardware name: Spreadtrum SP9863A-1H10 Board (DT)
> >> [  832.387083] Call trace:
> >> [  832.387086]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1e0
> >> [  832.387103]  show_stack+0x24/0x30
> >> [  832.387112]  dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84
> >> [  832.387123]  dump_stack+0x18/0x34
> >> [  832.387131]  handler_pre+0x40/0x50 [kprobe_example]
> >> [  832.387143]  opt_pre_handler+0x84/0xc0
> >> [  832.387154]  optprobe_optimized_callback+0xec/0x164
> >> [  832.387164]  optprobe_common+0x70/0xc4
> >> [  832.387173]  kernel_clone+0x98/0x440
> >> [  832.387182]  __do_sys_clone+0x54/0x80
> >> [  832.387191]  __arm64_sys_clone+0x2c/0x40
> >> [  832.387199]  invoke_syscall+0x50/0x120
> >> [  832.387208]  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x4c/0xf4
> >> [  832.387217]  do_el0_svc+0x30/0x9c
> >> [  832.387225]  el0_svc+0x20/0x60
> >> [  832.387235]  el0t_64_sync_handler+0xe8/0xf0
> >> [  832.387242]  el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4
> >>
> >>
> >> dup_mm backtrace from other:
> >> [  173.352294] CPU: 6 PID: 309 Comm: sh Not tainted 5.16.0-rc5+ #19
> >> [  173.352301] Hardware name: Spreadtrum SP9863A-1H10 Board (DT)
> >> [  173.352304] Call trace:
> >> [  173.352307]  dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1d4
> >> [  173.352319]  show_stack+0x18/0x24
> >> [  173.352326]  dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84
> >> [  173.352333]  dump_stack+0x18/0x34
> >> [  173.352338]  handler_pre+0x38/0x48 [kprobe_example]
> >> [  173.352347]  opt_pre_handler+0x74/0xb0
> >> [  173.352354]  optimized_callback+0x108/0x130
> >> [  173.352361]  optinsn_slot+0x258/0x1000
> >> [  173.352366]  dup_mm+0x4/0x4b0
> >> [  173.352373]  copy_process+0x1284/0x1360
> >> [  173.352378]  kernel_clone+0x5c/0x3c0
> >> [  173.352384]  __do_sys_clone+0x54/0x80
> >> [  173.352390]  __arm64_sys_clone+0x24/0x30
> >> [  173.352396]  invoke_syscall+0x48/0x114
> >> [  173.352402]  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x44/0xec
> >> [  173.352408]  do_el0_svc+0x24/0x90
> >> [  173.352413]  el0_svc+0x20/0x60
> >> [  173.352420]  el0t_64_sync_handler+0xe8/0xf0
> >> [  173.352427]  el0t_64_sync+0x1a0/0x1a4
> >
>
> Hi Masami and Jianhua,
>
> optprobe_common() is added to minize size of code in trampoline, but
> each trampoline is alloced as PAGE_SIZE, so optprobe_common() seems
> unnecessary, and will make optprobe_trampoline.S much more complicated.
> How about drop optprobe_common() and use a maro to reduce duplicate code .
>
1. each trampoline is allocated as
(MAX_OPTINSN_SIZE*sizeof(kprobe_opcode_t)), not PAGE_SIZE
2. MAX_OPTINSN_SIZE should be "((unsigned long)(optprobe_template_end
- optprobe_template_entry)),
   your MAX_OPTINSN_SIZE  is not accurate.

3.optprobe_template_val in different kprobe may not be aligned with 8 byte.
   ldr instruction for this value, may use address that not aligned 8 byte.
   "ldr x0, 1f
   .global optprobe_template_common"

Thanks,
Jianhua
> Thanks,
> Qi
> > Is the second one with your patch?
> >
> >>
> >> 2. The reserve memory "OPT_SLOT_SIZE - PAGE_SIZE"  is waste.
> >>     kernel/kprobe.c used only one PAGE_SIZE slot memory.
> >
> > Good catch!
> > Qi, can you make an array (or bit map) of usage flags and
> > manage the reserved memory?
> >
> > #define OPT_INSN_PAGES (OPT_SLOT_SIZE/PAGE_SIZE)
> > static bool insn_page_in_use[OPT_INSN_PAGES];
> >
> > void *alloc_optinsn_page(void)
> > {
> >       int i;
> >
> >       for (i = 0; i < OPT_INSN_PAGES; i++)
> >               if (!insn_page_in_use[i])
> >                       goto found;
> >       return NULL;
> > found:
> >       insn_page_in_use[i] = true;
> >       return (void *)((unsigned long)optinsn_slot + PAGE_SIZE * i);
> > }
> >
> > void free_optinsn_page(void *page)
> > {
> >       unsigned long idx = (unsigned long)page - (unsigned long)optinsn_slot;
> >
> >       WARN_ONCE(idx & (PAGE_SIZE - 1));
> >       idx >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
> >       if (WARN_ONCE(idx >= OPT_INSN_PAGES))
> >               return;
> >       insn_page_in_use[idx] = false;
> > }
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> >
> >
> >