linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: piix4: Replace piix4_smbus driver's cd6h/cd7h port io accesses with mmio accesses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yd/X6DlWjACLODe2@ninjato>
Date:   Thu, 13 Jan 2022 08:42:32 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
To:     Terry Bowman <Terry.Bowman@....com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: piix4: Replace piix4_smbus driver's cd6h/cd7h port
 io accesses with mmio accesses


> > On top of that I'm wondering why slow I/O is used? Do we have anything
> > that really needs that or is it simply a cargo-cult?
> 
> The efch SMBUS & WDT previously only supported a port I/O interface 
> (until recently) and thus dictated the HW access method.  

Is this enough information to start v2 of this series? Or does the
approach need more discussion?


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)