linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c: piix4: Replace piix4_smbus driver's cd6h/cd7h port io accesses with mmio accesses

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:24:41 +0200
From:   Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>, Terry Bowman <Terry.Bowman@....com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
        Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: piix4: Replace piix4_smbus driver's cd6h/cd7h port
 io accesses with mmio accesses

On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 9:42 AM Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>
> > > On top of that I'm wondering why slow I/O is used? Do we have anything
> > > that really needs that or is it simply a cargo-cult?
> >
> > The efch SMBUS & WDT previously only supported a port I/O interface
> > (until recently) and thus dictated the HW access method.
>
> Is this enough information to start v2 of this series? Or does the
> approach need more discussion?

I dunno why slow I/O is chosen, but it only affects design (read:
ugliness) of the new code.

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko