[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YeGFj/lfCLn79yzw@google.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 06:15:43 -0800
From: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
quic_rjendra@...cinc.com, sibis@...eaurora.org,
kgodara1@...eaurora.org, swboyd@...omium.org,
pmaliset@...eaurora.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Move herobrine-r0 to its
own dts
On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 04:43:01PM -0800, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> The upcoming herobrine-r1 board is really not very similar to
> herobrine-r0. Let's get rid of the "herobrine.dtsi" file and stick all
> the content in the -r0 dts file directly. We'll also rename the dts so
> it's obvious that it's just for -r0.
>
> While renaming, let's actually name the file so it's obvious that
> "herobrine" is both the name of the board and the name of the
> "baseboard". In other words "herobrine" is an actual board but also
> often used as the name of a whole class of similar boards that forked
> from a design. While "herobrine-herobrine" is a bit of mouthful it
> makes it more obvious which things are part of an actual board rather
> than the baseboard.
>
> NOTE: herobrine-rev0's days are likely doomed and this device tree is
> likely to be deleted in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists