[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YeHmB0BWgfVGPL55@iki.fi>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 23:07:19 +0200
From: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@...aro.org>
Cc: Tadeusz Struk <tstruk@...il.com>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] tpm: Fix error handling in async work
On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 10:47:29AM -0800, Tadeusz Struk wrote:
> On 1/12/22 10:35, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > These look good to me! Thank you. I'm in process of compiling a test
> > kernel.
>
> Thanks Jarkko,
> You can run the new test before and after applying the change and see
> how it behaves. Also just noticed a mistake in the comment, sorry but
> it was quite late when I sent it.
>
> + /*
> + * If ret is > 0 then tpm_dev_transmit returned the size of the
> + * response. If ret is < 0 then tpm_dev_transmit failed and
> + * returned a return code.
> + */
>
> In the above could you please replace:
>
> s/returned a return code/returned an error code/
>
> before applying the patch. I would appreciate that.
Please send new versions, there's also this:
def test_flush_invlid_context()
I'd figure "invlid" should be "invalid"
You can add, as these changes do not change the semantics of the
patches:
Tested-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
It's always best if you author the final version, as then a clear
reference on what was accepted exist at lore.kernel.org.
BR, Jarkko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists