linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] cifs: Replace one-element array with flexible-array member

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 17 Jan 2022 14:26:58 -0600
From:   Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
To:     cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc:     CIFS <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
        samba-technical <samba-technical@...ts.samba.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@....com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cifs: Replace one-element array with flexible-array member

Doesn't this change the address of the assignment in this line in the
function (smb2_ioctl_query_info)?

        /* Close */
        rqst[2].rq_iov = &vars->close_iov[0];

On Fri, Jan 14, 2022 at 8:44 AM <cgel.zte@...il.com> wrote:
>
> From: Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@....com.cn>
>
> There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having
> a dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code
> should always use "flexible array members" for these cases. The older
> style of one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used.
> Reference:
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#zero-length-and-one-element-arrays
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@....com.cn>
> ---
>  fs/cifs/smb2ops.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c b/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c
> index af5d0830bc8a..5c104b2f308a 100644
> --- a/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c
> +++ b/fs/cifs/smb2ops.c
> @@ -1609,10 +1609,10 @@ struct iqi_vars {
>         struct smb_rqst rqst[3];
>         struct kvec rsp_iov[3];
>         struct kvec open_iov[SMB2_CREATE_IOV_SIZE];
> -       struct kvec qi_iov[1];
> +       struct kvec qi_iov[];
>         struct kvec io_iov[SMB2_IOCTL_IOV_SIZE];
>         struct kvec si_iov[SMB2_SET_INFO_IOV_SIZE];
> -       struct kvec close_iov[1];
> +       struct kvec close_iov[];
>  };
>
>  static int
> --
> 2.25.1
>


-- 
Thanks,

Steve