[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOesGMg2eH1B94h+etPBDW3B1LMeHBytz0v2e0GfVRDv8gU0YA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2022 12:26:04 -0800
From: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Linux ARM Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/SAMSUNG EXYNOS ARM ARCHITECTURES"
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Sam Protsenko <semen.protsenko@...aro.org>,
Chanho Park <chanho61.park@...sung.com>,
Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...il.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 24/28] dt-bindings: pinctrl: samsung: convert to dtschema
On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 11:45 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com> wrote:
>
> On 16/01/2022 22:38, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 6:10 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Anyway DTS and dtschema will have to wait for one release, because they
> >> depend on samsung pinctrl driver change (patch #2).
> >
> > What about I put that (and maybe this schema) on an immutable
> > branch so you can pull the commit into your for-arm-soc branch and
> > put the DTS changes on top?
>
> That would be a solution if not a policy for arm-soc of keeping DTS
> separate. Arnd and Olof since some time are not happy when DTS branch
> receives any driver updates.
>
> Arnd, Olof,
> This is a set of dtschema conversion + DTS alignment with new schema:
> 1. Driver change necessary to accept new DTS (driver depends on node
> names and this has to change because of dtschema),
> 2. DTS commits depending on above, which convert node name to new format,
> 3. Finally dtschema requiring new naming of the GPIO nodes.
>
> If I got correctly, the policy of not mixing drivers and DTS requires
> that #2 above (DTS changes) will wait for one more release. During the
> time, if dtschema (#3 above) is applied, there will be new warnings
> about non-compliant DTS.
>
> Do you see any chance of merging driver + DTS + dtschema via same tree
> in same release?
Our general guidance to separate DTS and driver changes is to avoid
large entangled changes between the two, and to discourage a developer
mentality of "the implementation is the binding".
I think this is a good example of when it makes sense to bring in what
is a fairly small and clean driver change to deal with this. So the
right answer here is to stage such a stable branch and merge into both
arm-soc and the pinctrl subsystem trees as proposed.
-Olof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists