linux-kernel - Re: list iterator spacing: clang-format vs checkpatch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72=HdsTfQt5DWKf065pENN0xrOwvKq+T3JpHdyyRkPVx8w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Jan 2022 22:41:10 +0100
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Cc:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: list iterator spacing: clang-format vs checkpatch

Hi Jason,

On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 1:47 PM Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com> wrote:
>
> - If not, is clang-format ever going to be fixed to quit adding them?

`ControlStatementsExceptForEachMacros` was added in LLVM 11 (and
`SpaceBeforeParensOptions` in LLVM 14, which gives even more
fine-grained control).

So it is coming -- the question is whether we wait a bit until LLVM 11
is the minimum supported version (nowadays LLVM 10) or we are willing
to require LLVM 11.

Cheers,
Miguel