linux-kernel - Re: list iterator spacing: clang-format vs checkpatch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72nyGijSO8ShcDx5eg=O1+_hO9-gOgrqmoDYhc9K0Mojow@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 17 Jan 2022 22:41:16 +0100
From:   Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:     "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: list iterator spacing: clang-format vs checkpatch

Hi Joe,

On Mon, Jan 17, 2022 at 7:05 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>
> Doubtful as it's likely the .clang-format for_each list is
> just out of date for your particular for_each type use and
> the scripted bit that it uses to create them hasn't be

I will send an update.

> updated in awhile.  Also that scripted bit only works on files
> in include/ and not anything locally defined.
>
> [...]
>
> So it has false positives for some functions and not macros.

Yeah, for `clang-format` I tried to be conservative having only
`include/`, but we could change that.

Cheers,
Miguel