linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf test: Test 73 Sig

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <46d27f58-7732-3359-e0aa-090468a1cb22@huawei.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jan 2022 10:20:37 +0000
From:   John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>
To:     Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
CC:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Richter <tmricht@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>,
        <acme@...nel.org>, <svens@...ux.ibm.com>, <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        <sumanthk@...ux.ibm.com>, <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: Test 73 Sig_trap fails on s390

Hi Leo,

>> test child forked, pid 45193
> Both Arm and Arm64 platforms cannot support signal handler with
> breakpoint, please see the details in [1].  

Thanks for the info.

>So I think we need
> something like below:
> 

ok

> static int test__sigtrap(struct test_suite *test __maybe_unused, int subtest __maybe_unused)
> {
>          ...
> 
>          if (!BP_SIGNAL_IS_SUPPORTED) {
>                  pr_debug("Test not supported on this architecture");
>                  return TEST_SKIP;
>          }
> 
>          ...
> }
> 
> Since we have defined BP_SIGNAL_IS_SUPPORTED, I think we can reuse it at
> here.


Do you know any other architectures which would have this issue? Or a 
generic way to check for support?

It's better to not have to add to this list arch-by-arch..

> 
> [1]https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/157169993406.29376.12473771029179755767.tip-bot2@tip-bot2/
> 
>> And fails on my x86 broadwell machine:
>>
>> john@...alhost:~/kernel-dev2/tools/perf> sudo ./perf test -v 73
>> 73: Sigtrap                                                         :
>> --- start ---
>> test child forked, pid 22255
>> FAILED sys_perf_event_open(): Argument list too long
>> test child finished with -1
>> ---- end ----
>> Sigtrap: FAILED!
>> john@...alhost:~/kernel-dev2/tools/perf>
> It is a bit suprise for the failure on x86, as I remembered x86 platform
> can support signal handler with hw breakpoint.  And from the error
> "Argument list too long", it should be a different issue from other
> archs.

Yeah, I don't know what's going on here.

Thanks,
John