[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG48ez00FFW-n_Pi=+ya1xY5QuB3q2mPr8++scVe3h3ROeF_mg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2022 20:32:43 +0100
From: Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc: Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org,
Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tpm: vtpm_proxy: Double-check to avoid buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 7:37 PM Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org> wrote:
> When building with -Warray-bounds, this warning was emitted:
>
> In function 'memset',
> inlined from 'vtpm_proxy_fops_read' at drivers/char/tpm/tpm_vtpm_proxy.c:102:2:
> ./include/linux/fortify-string.h:43:33: warning: '__builtin_memset' pointer overflow between offset 164 and size [2147483648, 4294967295]
> [-Warray-bounds]
> 43 | #define __underlying_memset __builtin_memset
> | ^
Can you explain what that compiler warning actually means, and which
compiler it is from? Is this from a 32-bit or a 64-bit architecture?
It sounds like the compiler (GCC?) is hallucinating a codepath on
which "len" is guaranteed to be >=2147483648, right? Why is it doing
that? Is this some kinda side effect from the fortify code?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists