lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFU3qoZq7eWxF4Wtp6XJsasws55f=d4p9ksc0=25XOZue=W3pw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 18 Jan 2022 18:24:51 -0700
From:   Zan Aziz <zanaziz313@...il.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
        patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de,
        jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.16 00/28] 5.16.2-rc1 review

On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 9:17 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
>
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.16.2 release.
> There are 28 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 20 Jan 2022 16:04:42 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
>         https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.16.2-rc1.gz
> or in the git tree and branch at:
>         git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.16.y
> and the diffstat can be found below.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

Hi Greg,

Compiled and booted on my test system Lenovo P50s: Intel Core i7
No emergency and critical messages in the dmesg
I am going to be running perf bench sched from now on and I will
report any regressions

./perf bench sched all
# Running sched/messaging benchmark...
# 20 sender and receiver processes per group
# 10 groups == 400 processes run

     Total time: 0.437 [sec]

# Running sched/pipe benchmark...
# Executed 1000000 pipe operations between two processes

     Total time: 6.919 [sec]

       6.919489 usecs/op
         144519 ops/sec

Tested-by: Zan Aziz <zanaziz313@...il.com>

Thanks
-Zan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ