[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220119200841.fupa3hemmswllmxc@box.shutemov.name>
Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 23:08:41 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, luto@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
aarcange@...hat.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
david@...hat.com, jgross@...e.com, jmattson@...gle.com,
joro@...tes.org, jpoimboe@...hat.com, knsathya@...nel.org,
pbonzini@...hat.com, sdeep@...are.com, seanjc@...gle.com,
tony.luck@...el.com, vkuznets@...hat.com, wanpengli@...cent.com,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/26] x86/tdx: Support TDX guest port I/O at
decompression time
On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 08:46:24PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 19, 2022 at 06:49:25PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > const struct port_io_ops default_pio_ops = {
> > .inb = inb,
> > .inw = inw,
> > .inl = inl,
> > .outb = outb,
> > .outw = outw,
> > .outl = outl,
> > };
> >
> > make pio_ops a pointer and assign it here:
> >
> > pio_ops = &default_pio_ops;
> >
> > But it leads to an issue on linking:
> >
> > ld.lld: error: Unexpected run-time relocations (.rela) detected!
>
> So the above generates absolute relocations of type R_X86_64_64
>
> Relocation section '.rela.data.rel.local' at offset 0x5c18 contains 6 entries:
> Offset Info Type Sym. Value Sym. Name + Addend
> 000000000000 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + 10
> 000000000008 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + 30
> 000000000010 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + 50
> 000000000018 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + 0
> 000000000020 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + 20
> 000000000028 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + 40
>
> and the linker doesn't like them probably because of the mcmodel we use
> but I need to talk to toolchain folks first to make sense of what's
> going on...
JFYI, the message comes from ASSERT in vmlinux.lds.S.
I assume for now I can proceed with the assignment that works, right?
It can be changed later once we figure out what is going on.
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists