[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <139e5fb6-b917-163e-751c-1ef745852529@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Jan 2022 11:37:29 +0000
From: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
To: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
Cc: mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
suzuki.poulose@....com, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] coresight: Fix TRCCONFIGR.QE sysfs interface
On 19/01/2022 15:22, Mike Leach wrote:
> Hi James
>
> On Fri, 14 Jan 2022 at 17:33, James Clark <james.clark@....com> wrote:
>>
>> It's impossible to program a valid value for TRCCONFIGR.QE
>> when TRCIDR0.QSUPP==0b10. In that case the following is true:
>>
>> Q element support is implemented, and only supports Q elements without
>> instruction counts. TRCCONFIGR.QE can only take the values 0b00 or 0b11.
>>
>> Currently the low bit of QSUPP is checked to see if the low bit of QE can
>> be written to, but as you can see when QSUPP==0b10 the low bit is cleared
>> making it impossible to ever write the only valid value of 0b11 to QE.
>> 0b10 would be written instead, which is a reserved QE value even for all
>> values of QSUPP.
>>
>> The fix is to allow writing the low bit of QE for any non zero value of
>> QSUPP.
>>
>> This change doesn't go any further to validate if the user supplied value
>> is valid, because none of the other parts this function do, but it does fix
>> the case where it was impossible to ever set a valid value.
>>
>
> I concur that the input is not checked as valid, However all the other
> fields are single bit - with no invalid values - other than the cond
> field, which controls tracing of non-branch conditionals -
> architecturally unsupported for A profile in ETMv4/.
>
>
>> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
>> ---
>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c
>> index a0640fa5c55b..a99bb537ea23 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-sysfs.c
>> @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static ssize_t mode_store(struct device *dev,
>> /* start by clearing QE bits */
>> config->cfg &= ~(BIT(13) | BIT(14));
>> /* if supported, Q elements with instruction counts are enabled */
>> - if ((mode & BIT(0)) && (drvdata->q_support & BIT(0)))
>> + if ((mode & BIT(0)) && drvdata->q_support)
>> config->cfg |= BIT(13);
>
> This can be trivially changed to
>
> if ((mode) && drvdata->q_support)
> config->cfg |= BIT(13);
>
> to ensure that any input mode 2'b01, 2'b10, 2'b11 results in output
> settings of 2'b01, 2'b11, 2'b11 respectively
>
> With that
>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>
>
Thanks for the review. Can I also get your opinion about this one? At the very least
I think the comment is not detailed enough, but I also think that case 0 should set
BIT(0) rather than BIT(1). Or is there some edge case and it's correct?
/* start by clearing all instruction event enable bits */
config->eventctrl1 &= ~(BIT(0) | BIT(1) | BIT(2) | BIT(3));
switch (drvdata->nr_event) {
case 0x0:
/* generate Event element for event 1 */
config->eventctrl1 |= val & BIT(1);
break;
case 0x1:
/* generate Event element for event 1 and 2 */
config->eventctrl1 |= val & (BIT(0) | BIT(1));
break;
case 0x2:
/* generate Event element for event 1, 2 and 3 */
config->eventctrl1 |= val & (BIT(0) | BIT(1) | BIT(2));
break;
case 0x3:
/* generate Event element for all 4 events */
config->eventctrl1 |= val & 0xF;
break;
default:
break;
}
>> /*
>> * if supported, Q elements with and without instruction
>> --
>> 2.17.1
>>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists