[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <70a24c20-d7ee-064c-e863-9f012422a2f5@fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 10:33:58 +0800
From: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
<nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>, <djwong@...nel.org>,
<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <david@...morbit.com>,
<jane.chu@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 10/10] fsdax: set a CoW flag when associate reflink
mappings
在 2022/1/20 16:59, Christoph Hellwig 写道:
> On Sun, Dec 26, 2021 at 10:34:39PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
>> +#define FS_DAX_MAPPING_COW 1UL
>> +
>> +#define MAPPING_SET_COW(m) (m = (struct address_space *)FS_DAX_MAPPING_COW)
>> +#define MAPPING_TEST_COW(m) (((unsigned long)m & FS_DAX_MAPPING_COW) == \
>> + FS_DAX_MAPPING_COW)
>
> These really should be inline functions and probably use lower case
> names.
OK.
>
> But different question, how does this not conflict with:
>
> #define PAGE_MAPPING_ANON 0x1
>
> in page-flags.h?
Now we are treating dax pages, so I think its flags should be different
from normal page. In another word, PAGE_MAPPING_ANON is a flag of rmap
mechanism for normal page, it doesn't work for dax page. And now, we
have dax rmap for dax page. So, I think this two kinds of flags are
supposed to be used in different mechanisms and won't conflect.
>
> Either way I think this flag should move to page-flags.h and be
> integrated with the PAGE_MAPPING_FLAGS infrastucture.
And that's why I keep them in this dax.c file.
--
Thanks,
Ruan.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists