| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <9d8ff96b-8a1d-6778-cb71-1e5855303f8a@amlogic.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jan 2022 10:51:56 +0800
From: Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com>
To: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V6 3/5] tty: serial: meson: Describes the calculation of
the UART baud rate clock using a clock frame
Hi Jerome ,
Thank you very much for your reply.
At present, it is found that after using CCF to describe baud rate
clock, when using stty to change baud rate, the situation will be stuck.
If initcall_debug is enabled, the initialization of the UART driver
takes longer . Shall we discuss this first and change it as you suggest?
I have replied to Kevin about this question yesterday.
Do you need to discuss it? What should I do next?
On 2022/1/21 5:40, Jerome Brunet wrote:
> [ EXTERNAL EMAIL ]
>
>
> On Tue 18 Jan 2022 at 11:09, Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com> wrote:
>
>> Using the common Clock code to describe the UART baud rate clock
>> makes it easier for the UART driver to be compatible with the
>> baud rate requirements of the UART IP on different meson chips.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Tu <yu.tu@...ogic.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c | 195 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>> 1 file changed, 142 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c b/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
>> index 7570958d010c..92fa91c825e6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
>> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/meson_uart.c
>> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>> */
>>
>> #include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
>> #include <linux/console.h>
>> #include <linux/delay.h>
>> #include <linux/init.h>
>> @@ -65,9 +66,7 @@
>> #define AML_UART_RECV_IRQ(c) ((c) & 0xff)
>>
>> /* AML_UART_REG5 bits */
>> -#define AML_UART_BAUD_MASK 0x7fffff
>> #define AML_UART_BAUD_USE BIT(23)
>> -#define AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL BIT(24)
>>
>> #define AML_UART_PORT_NUM 12
>> #define AML_UART_PORT_OFFSET 6
>> @@ -76,6 +75,11 @@
>> #define AML_UART_POLL_USEC 5
>> #define AML_UART_TIMEOUT_USEC 10000
>>
>> +struct meson_uart_data {
>> + struct clk *baud_clk;
>> + bool use_xtal_clk;
>> +};
>> +
>> static struct uart_driver meson_uart_driver;
>>
>> static struct uart_port *meson_ports[AML_UART_PORT_NUM];
>> @@ -293,19 +297,17 @@ static int meson_uart_startup(struct uart_port *port)
>>
>> static void meson_uart_change_speed(struct uart_port *port, unsigned long baud)
>> {
>> + struct meson_uart_data *private_data = port->private_data;
>> u32 val;
>>
>> while (!meson_uart_tx_empty(port))
>> cpu_relax();
>>
>> - if (port->uartclk == 24000000) {
>> - val = ((port->uartclk / 3) / baud) - 1;
>> - val |= AML_UART_BAUD_XTAL;
>> - } else {
>> - val = ((port->uartclk * 10 / (baud * 4) + 5) / 10) - 1;
>> - }
>> + val = readl(port->membase + AML_UART_REG5);
>> val |= AML_UART_BAUD_USE;
>> writel(val, port->membase + AML_UART_REG5);
>> +
>> + clk_set_rate(private_data->baud_clk, baud);
>> }
>>
>> static void meson_uart_set_termios(struct uart_port *port,
>> @@ -395,11 +397,20 @@ static int meson_uart_verify_port(struct uart_port *port,
>>
>> static void meson_uart_release_port(struct uart_port *port)
>> {
>> - /* nothing to do */
>> + struct meson_uart_data *private_data = port->private_data;
>> +
>> + clk_disable_unprepare(private_data->baud_clk);
>> }
>>
>> static int meson_uart_request_port(struct uart_port *port)
>> {
>> + struct meson_uart_data *private_data = port->private_data;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(private_data->baud_clk);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -629,57 +640,105 @@ static struct uart_driver meson_uart_driver = {
>> .cons = MESON_SERIAL_CONSOLE,
>> };
>>
>> -static inline struct clk *meson_uart_probe_clock(struct device *dev,
>> - const char *id)
>> -{
>> - struct clk *clk = NULL;
>> - int ret;
>> -
>> - clk = devm_clk_get(dev, id);
>> - if (IS_ERR(clk))
>> - return clk;
>> -
>> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
>> - if (ret) {
>> - dev_err(dev, "couldn't enable clk\n");
>> - return ERR_PTR(ret);
>> - }
>> -
>> - devm_add_action_or_reset(dev,
>> - (void(*)(void *))clk_disable_unprepare,
>> - clk);
>> -
>> - return clk;
>> -}
>> +static struct clk_div_table xtal_div_table[] = {
>> + {0, 3},
>> + {1, 1},
>> + {2, 2},
>> + {3, 2},
>> +};
>>
>> -static int meson_uart_probe_clocks(struct platform_device *pdev,
>> - struct uart_port *port)
>> +static int meson_uart_probe_clocks(struct uart_port *port)
>> {
>> - struct clk *clk_xtal = NULL;
>> - struct clk *clk_pclk = NULL;
>> - struct clk *clk_baud = NULL;
>> + struct meson_uart_data *private_data = port->private_data;
>> + struct clk *clk_baud, *clk_xtal;
>> + struct clk_hw *hw;
>> + char clk_name[32];
>> + struct clk_parent_data use_xtal_mux_parents[2] = {
>> + { .index = -1, },
>> + { .index = -1, },
>> + };
>
> You are using hw pointers later, you don't need to init the index to -1
> I think
>
>>
>> - clk_pclk = meson_uart_probe_clock(&pdev->dev, "pclk");
>> - if (IS_ERR(clk_pclk))
>> - return PTR_ERR(clk_pclk);
>> + clk_baud = devm_clk_get(port->dev, "baud");
>> + if (IS_ERR(clk_baud)) {
>> + dev_err(port->dev, "Failed to get the 'baud' clock\n");
>> + return PTR_ERR(clk_baud);
>> + }
>>
>> - clk_xtal = meson_uart_probe_clock(&pdev->dev, "xtal");
>> + clk_xtal = devm_clk_get(port->dev, "xtal");
>> if (IS_ERR(clk_xtal))
>> - return PTR_ERR(clk_xtal);
>> -
>> - clk_baud = meson_uart_probe_clock(&pdev->dev, "baud");
>> - if (IS_ERR(clk_baud))
>> - return PTR_ERR(clk_baud);
>> + return dev_err_probe(port->dev, PTR_ERR(clk_xtal),
>> + "Failed to get the 'xtal' clock\n");
>> +
>> + if (private_data->use_xtal_clk) {
>> + snprintf(clk_name, sizeof(clk_name), "%s#%s", dev_name(port->dev),
>> + "xtal_div");
>> + hw = devm_clk_hw_register_divider_table(port->dev,
>> + clk_name,
>> + __clk_get_name(clk_baud),
>> + CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT,
>> + port->membase + AML_UART_REG5,
>> + 26, 2,
>> + CLK_DIVIDER_READ_ONLY,
>> + xtal_div_table, NULL);
>> + if (IS_ERR(hw))
>> + return PTR_ERR(hw);
>> +
>> + use_xtal_mux_parents[1].hw = hw;
>> + } else {
>> + snprintf(clk_name, sizeof(clk_name), "%s#%s", dev_name(port->dev),
>> + "clk81_div4");
>> + hw = devm_clk_hw_register_fixed_factor(port->dev,
>> + clk_name,
>> + __clk_get_name(clk_baud),
>> + CLK_SET_RATE_NO_REPARENT,
>> + 1, 4);
>> + if (IS_ERR(hw))
>> + return PTR_ERR(hw);
>> +
>> + use_xtal_mux_parents[0].hw = hw;
>> + }
>
> The above is still wrong.
>
> use_xtal_mux_parents initialize both parent to nothing
> And you init the parent in the conditional above.
> It is means only one path is actually set instead of both.
>
> The mux always has 2 sources - Both should be set regardless of the HW version
> You just add
> * /4 on path 0 on legacy SoC
> * the funky divider on path 1 on newer SoC.
>
>>
>> - port->uartclk = clk_get_rate(clk_baud);
>> + snprintf(clk_name, sizeof(clk_name), "%s#%s", dev_name(port->dev),
>> + "use_xtal");
>> + hw = __devm_clk_hw_register_mux(port->dev, NULL,
>> + clk_name,
>> + ARRAY_SIZE(use_xtal_mux_parents),
>> + NULL, NULL,
>> + use_xtal_mux_parents,
>> + CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
>> + port->membase + AML_UART_REG5,
>> + 24, 0x1,
>> + CLK_MUX_READ_ONLY,
>> + NULL, NULL);
>> + if (IS_ERR(hw))
>> + return PTR_ERR(hw);
>> +
>> + port->uartclk = clk_hw_get_rate(hw);
>> +
>> + snprintf(clk_name, sizeof(clk_name), "%s#%s", dev_name(port->dev),
>> + "baud_div");
>> + hw = devm_clk_hw_register_divider(port->dev,
>> + clk_name,
>> + clk_hw_get_name(hw),
>> + CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT,
>> + port->membase + AML_UART_REG5,
>> + 0, 23,
>> + CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST,
>> + NULL);
>> + if (IS_ERR(hw))
>> + return PTR_ERR(hw);
>> +
>> + private_data->baud_clk = hw->clk;
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> + struct meson_uart_data *private_data;
>> struct resource *res_mem;
>> struct uart_port *port;
>> + struct clk *pclk;
>> u32 fifosize = 64; /* Default is 64, 128 for EE UART_0 */
>> int ret = 0;
>> int irq;
>> @@ -705,6 +764,15 @@ static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> if (!res_mem)
>> return -ENODEV;
>>
>> + pclk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "pclk");
>> + if (IS_ERR(pclk))
>> + return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, PTR_ERR(pclk),
>> + "Failed to get the 'pclk' clock\n");
>> +
>> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(pclk);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>
> I think this is unbalanced.
>
>> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> if (irq < 0)
>> return irq;
>> @@ -724,9 +792,13 @@ static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> if (IS_ERR(port->membase))
>> return PTR_ERR(port->membase);
>>
>> - ret = meson_uart_probe_clocks(pdev, port);
>> - if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> + private_data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*private_data),
>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!private_data)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + if (device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev))
>> + private_data->use_xtal_clk = true;
>>
>> port->iotype = UPIO_MEM;
>> port->mapbase = res_mem->start;
>> @@ -740,6 +812,11 @@ static int meson_uart_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> port->x_char = 0;
>> port->ops = &meson_uart_ops;
>> port->fifosize = fifosize;
>> + port->private_data = private_data;
>> +
>> + ret = meson_uart_probe_clocks(port);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>>
>> meson_ports[pdev->id] = port;
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, port);
>> @@ -766,10 +843,22 @@ static int meson_uart_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> }
>>
>> static const struct of_device_id meson_uart_dt_match[] = {
>> - { .compatible = "amlogic,meson6-uart" },
>> - { .compatible = "amlogic,meson8-uart" },
>> - { .compatible = "amlogic,meson8b-uart" },
>> - { .compatible = "amlogic,meson-gx-uart" },
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "amlogic,meson6-uart",
>> + .data = (void *)false,
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "amlogic,meson8-uart",
>> + .data = (void *)false,
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "amlogic,meson8b-uart",
>> + .data = (void *)false,
>> + },
>> + {
>> + .compatible = "amlogic,meson-gx-uart",
>> + .data = (void *)true,
>> + },
>> { /* sentinel */ },
>> };
>> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, meson_uart_dt_match);
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists