linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] clk: renesas: Add support for RZ/V2L SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+V-a8uD_EhOFBvKxMsaXcGV2PU1SSgKEis5MmO68xUM2702ww@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 21 Jan 2022 16:31:56 +0000
From:   "Lad, Prabhakar" <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
To:     Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc:     Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>,
        Linux-Renesas <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] clk: renesas: Add support for RZ/V2L SoC

Hi Geert,

Thank you for the review.

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 2:45 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Prabhakar, Biju,
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 2:47 PM Lad Prabhakar
> <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com> wrote:
> > From: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
> >
> > The clock structure for RZ/V2L is almost identical to RZ/G2L SoC. The only
> > difference being RZ/V2L has an additional registers to control clock and
> > reset for the DRP-AI block.
> >
> > This patch adds minimal clock and reset entries required to boot the
> > system on Renesas RZ/V2L SMARC EVK and binds it with the RZ/G2L CPG core
> > driver.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com>
>
> Thanks for your patch!
>
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/renesas/r9a07g054-cpg.c
>
> > +const struct rzg2l_cpg_info r9a07g054_cpg_info = {
> > +       /* Core Clocks */
> > +       .core_clks = r9a07g054_core_clks,
> > +       .num_core_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(r9a07g054_core_clks),
> > +       .last_dt_core_clk = LAST_DT_CORE_CLK,
> > +       .num_total_core_clks = MOD_CLK_BASE,
> > +
> > +       /* Critical Module Clocks */
> > +       .crit_mod_clks = r9a07g054_crit_mod_clks,
> > +       .num_crit_mod_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(r9a07g054_crit_mod_clks),
> > +
> > +       /* Module Clocks */
> > +       .mod_clks = r9a07g054_mod_clks,
> > +       .num_mod_clks = ARRAY_SIZE(r9a07g054_mod_clks),
> > +       .num_hw_mod_clks = R9A07G054_TSU_PCLK + 1,
>
> R9A07G054_STPAI_ACLK_DRP
>
Agreed.

> > +
> > +       /* Resets */
> > +       .resets = r9a07g054_resets,
> > +       .num_resets = ARRAY_SIZE(r9a07g054_resets),
> > +};
>
> Given RZ/V2L is RZ/G2L + DRP-AI, and the common clock IDs are the
> same, what about reusing r9a07g044-cpg.c, and just adding a separate
> r9a07g054_cpg_info?
>
Agreed. To clarify for clock and reset entries for common we use the
macros defined for RZ/G2L and for DRP entries we use the RZ/V2L macros
(which will be an additional member) ?

> When you add DRP-AI clocks and resets later, you just have to make
> sure .num_{core_clks,mod_clks,resets} are correct, similar to how
> drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pfc-r8a77951.c handles common and automotive
> pin groups and functions.
>
Agreed.

Cheers,
Prabhakar