linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC V1 net-next 3/4] net: Let the active time stamping layer be selectable.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220121040508.GA7588@hoboy.vegasvil.org>
Date:   Thu, 20 Jan 2022 20:05:08 -0800
From:   Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@....com>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
        Kurt Kanzenbach <kurt@...utronix.de>,
        Miroslav Lichvar <mlichvar@...hat.com>,
        Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V1 net-next 3/4] net: Let the active time stamping
 layer be selectable.

On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 04:38:09AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:

> So in the extreme case, you have 7 time stamps, 3 from MACs and 4 from
> PHYs!

:^)
 
> I doubt we want to support this, is there a valid use case for it?

Someday, someone will surely say it is important, but with any luck
I'll be dead by then...

Cheers,
Richard