[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <81487bcb-6f48-9a15-2884-fb1441210d2f@oracle.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2022 05:50:41 +0800
From: Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com>
To: trix@...hat.com, clm@...com, josef@...icpanda.com,
dsterba@...e.com, nathan@...nel.org, ndesaulniers@...gle.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: initialize variable cancel
On 21/01/2022 21:45, trix@...hat.com wrote:
> From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
>
> Clang static analysis reports this problem
> ioctl.c:3333:8: warning: 3rd function call argument is an
> uninitialized value
> ret = exclop_start_or_cancel_reloc(fs_info,
>
> cancel is only set in one branch of an if-check and is
> always used. So initialize to false.
>
> Fixes: 1a15eb724aae ("btrfs: use btrfs_get_dev_args_from_path in dev removal ioctls")
> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/ioctl.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> index 190ad8af4f45a..26e82379747f8 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/ioctl.c
> @@ -3308,7 +3308,7 @@ static long btrfs_ioctl_rm_dev(struct file *file, void __user *arg)
> struct block_device *bdev = NULL;
> fmode_t mode;
> int ret;
> - bool cancel;
> + bool cancel = false;
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@...cle.com>
Thanks,
Anand
>
> if (!capable(CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
> return -EPERM;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists