[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ye7cNMZku7jlRHa+@google.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2022 17:04:52 +0000
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Ayush Ranjan <ayushranjan@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Andrei Vagin <avagin@...il.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gvisor: add some missing definitions to vmx.h
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 1/23/22 20:53, Ayush Ranjan wrote:
> > From: Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>
> >
> > gvisor needs definitions for some additional secondary exec controls.
> >
> > Tested: builds
> > Signed-off-by: Ayush Ranjan <ayushranjan@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Davidson <md@...gle.com>
>
> Incorrect order of the Signed-off-by header (author goes first, submitter
> goes last).
>
> > ---
> > arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h | 1 +
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
> > index c77ad687cdf7..df40dc568eb9 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h
> > @@ -67,6 +67,7 @@
> > #define SECONDARY_EXEC_ENCLS_EXITING VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(ENCLS_EXITING)
> > #define SECONDARY_EXEC_RDSEED_EXITING VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(RDSEED_EXITING)
> > #define SECONDARY_EXEC_ENABLE_PML VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(PAGE_MOD_LOGGING)
> > +#define SECONDARY_EXEC_EPT_VE VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(EPT_VIOLATION_VE)
> > #define SECONDARY_EXEC_PT_CONCEAL_VMX VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(PT_CONCEAL_VMX)
> > #define SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(XSAVES)
> > #define SECONDARY_EXEC_MODE_BASED_EPT_EXEC VMCS_CONTROL_BIT(MODE_BASED_EPT_EXEC)
>
> I'm not sure why gvisor would care about an internal Linux header. gvisor
> should only use arch/x86/include/uapi headers.
It's Google-internal kernel crud, this patch should not be merged. Though with a
bit of patience, an equivalent patch will come with TDX support. If we do merge
something before TDX, I'd strongly prefer to take that "complete" version with a
rewritten changelog.
[*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/e519d6ae1e75a4bea494bb3940e1272e935ead18.1625186503.git.isaku.yamahata@intel.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists