[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3f9a9731-c096-bc9b-63df-bd1dff032737@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2022 10:44:39 +0000
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>,
miquel.raynal@...tlin.com, richard@....at, vigneshr@...com,
robh+dt@...nel.org
Cc: linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, chenshumin86@...a.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] nvmem: core: Fix a conflict between MTD and NVMEM on
wp-gpios property
On 05/01/2022 13:57, Christophe Kerello wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> index e765d3d0542e..e11c74db64f9 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> @@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *config)
>
> if (config->wp_gpio)
> nvmem->wp_gpio = config->wp_gpio;
> - else
> + else if (config->reg_write)
This is clearly not going to work for everyone.
A flag in nvmem_config to indicate that wp gpio is managed by provider
driver would be the right thing to do here.
> nvmem->wp_gpio = gpiod_get_optional(config->dev, "wp",
> GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
--srini
Powered by blists - more mailing lists