[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9662651a-12d9-4893-95c2-aa1a3a10302d@foss.st.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2022 12:08:38 +0100
From: Christophe Kerello <christophe.kerello@...s.st.com>
To: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>,
<miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <richard@....at>, <vigneshr@...com>,
<robh+dt@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <chenshumin86@...a.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] nvmem: core: Fix a conflict between MTD and NVMEM on
wp-gpios property
Hi Srinivas, Miquel,
On 1/25/22 11:44, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>
>
> On 05/01/2022 13:57, Christophe Kerello wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
>> index e765d3d0542e..e11c74db64f9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
>> @@ -769,7 +769,7 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct
>> nvmem_config *config)
>> if (config->wp_gpio)
>> nvmem->wp_gpio = config->wp_gpio;
>> - else
>> + else if (config->reg_write)
> This is clearly not going to work for everyone.
>
> A flag in nvmem_config to indicate that wp gpio is managed by provider
> driver would be the right thing to do here.
Based on your inputs, I will add a new boolean flag in nvmen_config
(proposal name: skip_wp_gpio) and I will set it to true in mtdcore.c
when nvmen_config structure is initialized. It will be part of the V2.
Regards,
Christophe Kerello.
>> nvmem->wp_gpio = gpiod_get_optional(config->dev, "wp",
>> GPIOD_OUT_HIGH);
>
> --srini
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists